Efficiency of Alternative Technologies and Cultural Practices for Cotton in Georgia
C. W. Ward,F. White,A. Flanders,O. Isengildina
2002-08-22
Abstract:Introduction Developments in production practices and technological advances in seed genetics have given cotton farmers new options to consider in maximizing profits. Besides conventional cotton, farmers have available genetically modified cotton varieties, such as Bt, Roundup Ready (RR), Buctril Resistant (BXN), and stacked gene (BtRR). Transgenic varieties have a built-in resistance to certain pests (Bt cotton is toxic to the cotton bollworm and tobacco budworm) or tolerance to herbicides (Roundup Ready and Buctril Resistant cotton). These varieties allow substitution of current inputs by alternative inputs that are complementary to transgenic seeds. Alternative cultural practices available to farmers are conventional tillage and conservation tillage (strip-till, no-till, or reduced tillage). With the rapid expansion of available technology, it is difficult for farmers to evaluate combinations of inputs in order to maximize profits. Impact assessments are available for benefits of adopting genetically modified (GM) crops. FernandezCornejo and McBride (2002) apply survey data from US farmers over a two-year period. Production of GM cotton, corn, and soybeans have a consistently positive impact on yields, but only 50% of the reported results have a positive impact for net returns. The level of infestation and the seed premium paid by the farmer determine increased profitability of insect resistant crops. Use of GM crops is correlated with reduced aggregate use of pesticides. Although farmers having previously adopted conservation tillage practices tend to select herbicide tolerant crops, available data does not support herbicide tolerant crops leading to increased adoption of conservation tillage. Farmers make simultaneous decisions about multiple pest control solutions that are interdependent (Kalaitzandonakes & Suntornpithug, 2001). A survey of cotton producers attempts to determine the reasons that farmers adopt GM cotton varieties. Adoption of GM cotton is primarily due to effective control of pests. This is related to the yield enhancement result of FernandezCornejo and McBride (2002). Other factors for adoption are cost savings and reduction of production risks. Synergies between herbicide resistance and conservation tillage practices are quantified. In this study, adoption of varieties with RR technology leads to adoption of conservation tillage practices. Other research examines different aspects of growing genetically modified cotton varieties. Wier, Mullins, and Mills (1998) conduct economic analysis of Bollgard (Bt) cotton relative to conventional cotton varieties in Mississippi and conclude that Bollgard is superior to conventional cotton. However, Bachelor, Mott, and Morrison (1998) do not find significant economic benefits of growing Bt cotton in North Carolina and recommend it only for difficult-to-treat fields and environmentally sensitive areas. Limited information exists on comparing costs and benefits across genetically modified varieties. Therefore, there is a need for a more general and conclusive study of economic impacts of growing genetically modified cotton varieties. An aspect that needs further investigation is the effect of combining different technologies with alternative tillage practices. Bell, Harris, and Wilson (1998) evaluate the implications of conservation tillage (strip tillage in particular) on fertilizer effectiveness for conventional cotton. It has been posited that Roundup Ready technology may enhance the benefits of conservation tillage. Therefore, the objective of this study is to provide an economic analysis of efficiency and profit Clayton W. Ward County Extension Agent, University of Georgia
Engineering,Agricultural and Food Sciences