Abstract:Background: Little is known about whether children's cancer services actually meet children's needs, as the majority of previous research has sought the views of parents as proxies. Objectives: To explore children's and young peoples' views of cancer care and to present a conceptual model of communication and information sharing. Settings: Three Principal Cancer Treatment centres in the United Kingdom. Participants: Thirty-eight participants at different stages of the cancer journey (e.g. on treatment, near end of treatment, up to 18 months following treatment) were grouped for data collection by age: young children (4-5 years), older children (6-12 years) and young people (13-19 years). Methods: Data were collected concurrently over 6 months using age-appropriate, participatory-based techniques. Techniques included play and puppets, the draw and write method, interviews and an activities day. Results: Some findings confirmed previously reported issues, such as, young children's inabilities to voice their preferences, and the importance of familiar environments and parental support for all ages. New findings suggested children worry about the permanence of symptoms, and older children are unhappy about their parents leading communications with health professionals. As communication and information sharing featured as an area in which children's and young people's preferences changed most dramatically, we propose a conceptual model of communication roles of patients, their parents, and health professionals to illuminate communication patterns. The model suggests children (aged 4-12 years) reside in the background of information sharing with health professionals until they gain autonomy as young people (around age 13). They then move into the foreground, and their parents transition into a supportive background role. Reviewing this model may help younger children realise their abilities to voice their preferences and older children to move into the foreground. Parents and professionals, in turn, can learn to develop in their supportive background roles. We encourage further testing of the model to define roles within relevant contexts. Conclusions: Overall, this study offers a perspective on the needs and preferences of children and young people receiving cancer care. Differences across ages were more striking with reference to preferences for communication. These differences are highly relevant to the way we communicate information to children and young people.

Parent and medical team disagreements in the UK: universal lessons in the origins and resolution in conflict

Reasonable Parental and Medical Obligations in Pediatric Extraordinary Therapy

Compassion and mercy are not helpful in resolving intractable family-physician conflicts on end-of-life care

Conflict between parents, physicians, and healthcare professionals in medical decision‐making: How to address it—A systematic review from the ESPGHAN Ethics Committee

Clinical dilemmas in children with life-limiting illnesses: decision making and the law

How should we decide how to treat the child: harm versus best interests in cases of disagreement

Ethical issues in the daily medical care of children

Barriers to initiating and implementing palliative and end-of-life care for children with life-limiting conditions: a mixed-methods study in a UK children’s hospital

Respecting autonomy in young people

Involving parents in paediatric clinical ethics committee deliberations: a current controversy

Children and young people's experiences of cancer care: a qualitative research study using participatory methods

Where do families turn? Ethical dilemmas in the care of chronically critically Ill children

Frequency of Perceived Conflict between Families and Clinicians at Time of Clinical Ethics Consultation in Hospitalized Children

A Venn diagram of vulnerability: The convergence of pediatric palliative care and child maltreatment a narrative review, and a focus on communication

Balancing a Child's Best Interests and a Child's Views

Navigating parental disagreement: ethical analysis and a proposed approach

Medical indication regarding life-sustaining treatment for children: Focus groups with clinicians

[Judicial framework for medical decision-making concerning minors]

Parent and healthcare professional experiences of critical congenital heart disease in New Zealand to advance health equity

Parents’ participation in collegial meetings to discuss withholding or withdrawing treatment for their newborn: Working to improve information-sharing

Health Care Surrogacy Laws Do Not Adequately Address the Needs of Minors