Abstract:Background: Providing safe care in a sensitive and high-risk unit such as the ICU is one of the most crucial tasks for nurses. One way to establish the criteria for safe care is by creating a instrument to assess it. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of designing and psychometrically evaluating an instrument for safe nursing care in the ICU. Methods: The current study employed a sequential-exploratory mixed-method approach with two qualitative and quantitative phases. Based on the results of qualitative phase and the literature review, the primary instrument was designed. In the quantitative phase, the designed instrument underwent psychometric evaluation. Face, content and construct validity were assessed. Face validity was assessed by 20 nurses, and content validity was assessed by 26 experts. In the construct validity stage, the sample size for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) included 300 nurses, and for the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) included 200 nurses who work full-time in the ICUs of hospitals affiliated with Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences in western Iran. EFA sampling was conducted in three hospitals, encompassing six ICUs, while CFA sampling was carried out in two hospitals, covering four ICUs. Sampling was done using the convenience method. The reliability of the instrument was also assessed. Finally, the interpretability, feasibility, weighting, and scoring of the instrument were evaluated. Results: The qualitative phase identified three themes, including professional behavior (with categories: Implementation of policies, organizing communication, professional ethics), holistic care (with categories: systematic care, comprehensive care of all systems), and safety-oriented organization (with categories: human resource management and safe environment). The primary instrument was designed with 107 items rated on a five-point Likert scale. In the quantitative phase, the psychometrics of the instrument were conducted. First, the face and content validity were assessed, and the average scale content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.94. Then, a preliminary test was conducted to assess the initial reliability (α = 0.92) and the correlation of each item with the total score. After completing these steps, the number of items in the instrument was reduced to 52. The results of the EFA explained 58% of the total variance, with 4 factors identified: professional behavior by following guidelines, comprehensive care, accurate documentation, and pressure ulcer care. At the CFA stage, the results of the calculation of indices and goodness of fit showed that the model had a good fit. The reliability of the relative stability by examining the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the whole instrument in 20 samples was 0.92 with a confidence interval of 0.97 - 0.81. To measure absolute stability and determine the responsiveness of the instrument, the standard error of measurement (SEM) was 4.39 and the minimum detectable change (MDC) was 12.13. Conclusion: The instrument for safe nursing care in the ICU has favorable psychometric properties.

Intensive care unit dignified care: Development and validation of a questionnaire

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Barriers to Enteral Feeding Critically Ill Patients Questionnaire

Using the Delphi method to establish nursing-sensitive quality indicators for ICU nursing in China.

Intensive care unit dignified care: Persian translation and psychometric evaluation

Development And Validation Of A Questionnaire To Assess The Quality Of Life In Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease In Mainland China

Development of the Nurses' Practice Behavior in Caring of the Dying Evaluation Questionnaire and Psychometric Properties Test

Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Measure ICU Nurses' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Central Line Bloodstream Infection Practices.

Development and Validation of a questionnaire on human dignity in nursing cares: an exploratory sequential mixed study

Analysis of the status and influencing factors of dignity impairment symptoms in critically ill patients after ICU treatment

Designing and psychometric evaluation of safe nursing care instrument in intensive care units

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire for Family Members of ICU Patients

Psychometric Properties of the Ethical Conflict in Nursing Questionnaire Critical Care Version among Chinese Nurses: a Cross-Sectional Study

Intensivists' perceptions of what is missing in their compassionate care during interactions in the intensive care unit

Validation of the Chinese Empowerment of Parents in the Intensive Care (EMPATHIC-30) Questionnaire Among Parents in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study

Psychometric evaluation of the family caregiver ICU delirium knowledge questionnaire

Measuring the intensive care experience of intensive care unit patients: A cross-sectional study in western China

Developing and validating an assessment tool on Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Central Line- Associated Bloodstream Infection of ICU Nurses

Development and validation of the Nursing Information Security Questionnaire

Investigation of Caring Capacity of ICU Nurses

Self-efficacy of caring for patients in the intensive care unit with delirium: Development and validation of a scale for intensive care unit nurses

A research regarding the relationship among intensive care nurses' self-esteem, job satisfaction and subjective well-being