Is there a need for individualized adjustment of electrode belt position during EIT-guided titration of positive end-expiratory pressure?

Zhanqi Zhao,Tsai-Fen Chen,Hui-Chen Teng,Yi-Chun Wang,Mei-Yun Chang,Hou-Tai Chang,Feng Fu,Inez Frerichs,Knut Moeller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ac73d6
2022-05-27
Physiological Measurement
Abstract:Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the variation of tidal volume-to-impedance ratio (VT/ZT) during positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration with electrical impedance tomography (EIT) measurement. Approach: Forty-two patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were retrospectively analyzed. An incremental and subsequently a decremental PEEP trial were performed with steps of 2 cmH2O and duration of 2 minutes per step during volume-controlled ventilation with decelerating flow. EIT measurement was conducted in the 5th intercostal space and VT was recorded simultaneously. The variation of VT/ZT (RatioV) was defined as the changes in percentage to average ratio per cmH2O PEEP change. A z-score>1 was considered as a significant variation and an implication that the measurement plane was inadequate. Main results: The RatioV of 42 patients was 1.29±0.80 %∙cmH2O-1. A z-score of 1 corresponded to the variation of 2.09 %∙cmH2O-1. Seven patients (16.7%) had a z-score>1 and showed either positive or negative correlation between the volume-to-impedance ratio and PEEP. Significance: Electrode placement at 5th intercostal space might not be ideal for every individual during EIT measurement. Evaluation of volume-to-impedance ratio variation is necessary for patients undergoing maneuvers with wide alteration in absolute lung volume.
engineering, biomedical,biophysics,physiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?