Improving teamwork to reduce surgical mortality.
P. Pronovost,J. Freischlag
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1542
2010-10-20
Abstract:OPERATING ROOMS ARE AMONG THE MOST COMplex political, social, and cultural structures that exist, full of ritual, drama, hierarchy, and too often conflict. For instance, in a surgical morbidity and mortality conference in which a roomful of surgeons were reviewing the delayed transport of a trauma patient from the emergency department to the operating room, the senior surgeon asked a junior surgeon what he would do differently next time. He replied, “I’m going to push harder, I’m going to transport them to the operating room faster.” This response highlights what is so great but also so myopic about medicine. Physicians strongly advocate for patients, believing they alone are responsible for patient outcomes. Yet pushing harder is an ineffective intervention and may result in conflict rather than better patient outcomes. Health care, and especially surgical care, is too often viewed as primarily a solo activity rather than as a team function. Over the last few decades, surgical and anesthesia care have dramatically improved, by virtue of advances in surgical techniques and anesthesia interventions, enabling surgeons and anesthesiologists to master ever greater technical challenges. Patients have benefitted substantially, by surgeons and anesthesiologists meticulously improving technical work and by significant increases in the availability and use of less invasive techniques, even for complex operations. Yet despite these advances, patients still experience preventable harm, much of it from less than optimal teamwork rather than from technical shortcomings or failures. Poor teamwork contributes prominently to most adverse events, including those in the operating room. Using methods from aviation, researchers and clinicians have implemented interventions to improve teamwork in the operating room. In aviation’s past, pilots ignored the input of copilots because in their hierarchical culture, the copilot’s input had been deemed relatively unimportant. Now, to be licensed, pilots must demonstrate both technical and teamwork competencies. Health care can learn from these examples in aviation. For instance, in many health care sentinel events, a member of the health care team knew something was wrong but either did not speak up or spoke up and was ignored (P.J.P., unpublished data, 2008). Several studies have evaluated the use of checklists and briefings for reducing adverse events in surgical care. In a pilot study evaluating an operating room checklist with some technical elements (eg, use of antibiotics) and use of briefings and debriefings, Makary et al demonstrated improvements in teamwork and staff members’ perceptions of risks. However, some of the clinicians participating in the study resisted adopting these interventions, not convinced that improved teamwork would really benefit their patients. In a subsequent study, Haynes et al reported that use of a surgical checklist was associated with significant reductions in mortality, preventing 1 of every 2 deaths within 30 days of surgery. The study evaluated patients in 1 to 4 operating rooms at 8 sites and used a before-and-after design, but lacked concurrent controls, collected a large number of complex outcomes, and focused predominantly on technical work (completing the checklist items) and less on teamwork (encouraging interdisciplinary dialogue about risks). The authors reported a questionably large treatment effect, 1 death prevented per 143 patients, whereas other studies suggest that the preventable hospital mortality rate is approximately 1 in 400 patients and that 1 in 20 hospital deaths may be preventable. The study by Neily et al, reported in this issue of JAMA, provides strong evidence that improving teamwork was associated with reduced surgical mortality. This large and robustly designed study demonstrated that using a multifaceted intervention of medical team training, involving teamwork training, ongoing coaching, and checklists to trigger operating room briefings and debriefings, was associated with a reduction in mortality. In this retrospective health services cohort study using a contemporaneous control group, surgical mortality declined 18% at the 74 hospitals that implemented the Medical Team Training program, compared with a 7% mortality reduction in the 34 control hospitals. Importantly, there was a dose-response relationship, in which greater use of teamwork was associated with