Abstract:Purpose: It is likely that social determinants of health influence the gut microbiome (GM). The GM is a rising risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC), which disproportionately affects Black individuals and some Hispanic ethnic groups. We conducted a pilot investigation of the associations of race, ethnicity, and area level deprivation with the GM. Methods: We recruited adults receiving fecal immunochemical tests (FIT) for CRC screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers in a local Florida community setting. We manually extracted DNA from residual FIT stool among n=81 participants and conducted whole genome shotgun sequencing. Rarefied alpha (Observed ASVs and Shannon Index) and beta diversity (Bray Curtis distance) were calculated for species and genes. We estimated centered log ratio transformed taxonomic and functional profile relative abundances. We took an a priori approach, focused on bacteria and genes (e.g., those related to bile acids) that were previously associated with colorectal carcinogenesis. We estimated the percentage variation explained in beta diversity using multivariable PERMANOVA. Multivariable linear and zero-inflated quantile (ZINQ) regression models were used to estimate associations of race and ethnicity with microbial metrics. Results: In this pilot, n=54 (67%), n=18 (22%), and n=9 (11%) participants identified as Hispanic (H), Non-Hispanic White (NHW), and Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), respectively. The percentage variation in beta diversity explained by race/ethnicity was not statistically significant, but area level deprivation explained 3% (p=0.04) of Bray Curtis distance. Species alpha diversity was slightly lower among H individuals compared to NHW individuals (Shannon Index, β= -0.33, p=0.09). Several potentially pro-carcinogenic bacterial species and genera were more abundant among H compared to NHW individuals: Fusobacterium nucleatum (β = 0.54, pZINQ=0.01), Prevotella intermedia (β = 0.97, pZINQ=0.04), and Dialister (β = 1.69, pZINQ=0.14); Gemella morbillorum (β = 1.39, pZINQ=0.06) was more abundant in NHB compared to NHW participants. Several genes/pathways tended to be less abundant among H compared to NHW individuals, including those related to bacterial virulence [virB4 (β = -0.77, pZINQ=0.03)] and to butyrate synthesis pathways [atoB (β = -0.78, pZINQ=0.30)]. On the other hand, baiF, involved in secondary bile acid generation, was slightly more abundant among H compared to NHW participants (β = 0.23, pZINQ=0.17) while tyrB, involved in tyrosine and phenylalanine production, was slightly more abundant among NHB versus NHW individuals (β = 0.71, pZINQ=0.11). Conclusions: Several racial/ethnic differences in microbial metrics were identified. Importantly, microbiome metrics previously identified to promote colorectal carcinogenesis were more abundant in H and NHB compared to NHW individuals. Overall, our findings represent a promising first step to identifying GM-targeted intervention strategies (e.g., via diet) for effectively addressing CRC disparities. Citation Format: Stephanie Hogue, Maria F. Gomez, Jin Xu, Youngchul Kim, Rosa Veramendi, Martha Fuentes, Carolina Wetzler, Jessica Burns, Sugriva Forsyth, Rania Abdulla, Cathy Meade, Clement Gwede, Doratha A. Byrd. Gut microbiome differences across race, ethnicity, and area level deprivation among patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl) nr PR009.

Psychosocial stress and the gut microbiota

Abstract 3062: Modifiable factors and gut microbiome alteration among colorectal cancer patients

A case–control study of the association between the gut microbiota and colorectal cancer: exploring the roles of diet, stress, and race

Association of gut microbe and stress-related cancer metastasis and oleic acid degradation.

Associations between the Gut Microbiota, Race, and Ethnicity of Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Pilot and Feasibility Study

Microbiome and colorectal carcinogenesis: Linked mechanisms and racial differences

Gut Microbiota Imbalance in Colorectal Cancer Patients, the Risk Factor of COVID-19 Mortality

Influence of the Gut Microbiome, Diet, and Environment on Risk of Colorectal Cancer

Exploring the Relationship Between Diet, Lifestyle and Gut Microbiome in Colorectal Cancer Development: A Recent Update

Dysbiosis Signature of Fecal Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer Patients

A chronic stress-induced microbiome perturbation, highly enriched in Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014, promotes colorectal cancer growth and metastasis

Abstract PR009: Gut microbiome differences across race, ethnicity, and area level deprivation among patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers

Stressing Out Cancer: Chronic Stress Induces Dysbiosis and Enhances Colon Cancer Growth

Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis Drives the Development of Colorectal Cancer

Inflammation, microbiome and colorectal cancer disparity in African-Americans: Are there bugs in the genetics?

Emerging Evidence on the Effects of Dietary Factors on the Gut Microbiome in Colorectal Cancer

Chronic stress dampens Lactobacillus johnsonii-mediated tumor suppression to enhance colorectal cancer progression

Gut microbiota in inflammation and colorectal cancer: A potential Toolbox for Clinicians

Diversity of gut microbiota in patients with colorectal cancer

Immune System, Microbiota, and Microbial Metabolites: The Unresolved Triad in Colorectal Cancer Microenvironment

Microbiome Dysbiosis, Dietary Intake and Lifestyle-Associated Factors Involve in Epigenetic Modulations in Colorectal Cancer: A Narrative Review