Abstract:Purpose This study aims to investigate how the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Chinese outward foreign direct investments (FDI) impact the Belt and Road countries (BRCs). It draws on postcolonial theory to investigate the (geo)political objectives behind the financial and economic means. Design/methodology/approach In line with the nature of postcolonial studies, the study applies a discourse analysis integrating it with empirical data on indebtedness and trade. Findings This study finds that FDI and the BRI, as a development project, need to be considered a double-edged sword for the receiving countries. The authors provide evidence that China has instrumentalized financial and economic means to gain political influence and pursue geopolitical ambitions. Moreover, investments into sensitive sectors (e.g. energy, infrastructure), combined with the BRCs' inability to pay back loans, could eventually lead to China gaining control of these assets. Research limitations/implications The study investigates the financial and economic means that are instrumentalized to gain political influence while not considering flows of technology and know-how. It also limits itself to the study of FDI coming from one specific country, i.e. China. Therefore, no comparison and evaluation are made of FDI from other countries, such as the USA or European countries. Practical implications By revealing noncommercial objectives and geopolitical ambitions that China pursues through the BRI, the authors derive policy implications for the BRCs, third countries and China. Originality/value The study contributes to postcolonial theory and neocolonialism by investigating how China uses financial and economic means to achieve noncommercial objectives and pursue geopolitical ambitions. Additionally, the authors enhance the understanding of FDI by highlighting more subtle aspects of the complex and contextual nature of FDI as a social phenomenon, which have been overlooked thus far. The authors challenge the predominant positive framing of FDI and provide a counterpoint to the way FDI is often coined.

The Belt and Road Initiative in Southeast Asia: A Mixed Methods Examination

International Port Investment of Chinese Port-Related Companies

Review Of "The Chinese Belt And Road Initiative": Indonesia-China Cooperation And Future Opportunities For Indonesia'S Port Cities Development

The Chinese belt and road initiative: development project with strings attached?

Chinese Overseas Foreign Direct Investment–International Foreign Portfolio Investment–Financial Sector Development Nexus in the Belt and Road Initiative Economies: A Regional Analysis Based on Third-Generation Techniques

The Impact of China’s Belt and Road Initiative on Malaysia’s Construction Sector

Demystifying Chinese overseas investment in infrastructure: Port development, the Belt and Road Initiative and regional development

The Belt and Road Initiative in ASEAN - Thailand

Belt and Road Initiative and Chinese Firms' Outward Foreign Direct Investment

Determinants of China’s outward foreign direct investment in the Belt & Road economies

The Belt and Road Initiative: What is in it for China?

The impact of contextual distance on the investment locations of Chinese multinationals in countries along the Belt and Road initiative

Reflections on the Belt and Road Initiative

The Distributive Impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative

Make friends, not money: How Chinese enterprises select transport infrastructure investment locations along the Belt and Road

How green is the “Belt and Road Initiative”? – Evidence from Chinese OFDI in the energy sector

The Belt and Road Initiative, sister-city partnership and Chinese outward FDI

Challenges Faced by Chinese Firms Implementing the ‘belt and Road Initiative’: Evidence from Three Railway Projects

Belt and Road Initiative: Case Studies from Sri Lanka, Nepal and Thailand

Chinese investment in Southeast Asia: (how) does it matter?

Reversing the Bamboo Network: Chinese capital, geopolitics, and institutions in Southeast Asia