Abstract:BackgroundMany interventions found to be effective in health services research studies fail to translate into meaningful patient care outcomes across multiple contexts. Health services researchers recognize the need to evaluate not only summative outcomes but also formative outcomes to assess the extent to which implementation is effective in a specific setting, prolongs sustainability, and promotes dissemination into other settings. Many implementation theories have been published to help promote effective implementation. However, they overlap considerably in the constructs included in individual theories, and a comparison of theories reveals that each is missing important constructs included in other theories. In addition, terminology and definitions are not consistent across theories. We describe the Consolidated Framework For Implementation Research (CFIR) that offers an overarching typology to promote implementation theory development and verification about what works where and why across multiple contexts.MethodsWe used a snowball sampling approach to identify published theories that were evaluated to identify constructs based on strength of conceptual or empirical support for influence on implementation, consistency in definitions, alignment with our own findings, and potential for measurement. We combined constructs across published theories that had different labels but were redundant or overlapping in definition, and we parsed apart constructs that conflated underlying concepts.ResultsThe CFIR is composed of five major domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of the individuals involved, and the process of implementation. Eight constructs were identified related to the intervention (e.g., evidence strength and quality), four constructs were identified related to outer setting (e.g., patient needs and resources), 12 constructs were identified related to inner setting (e.g., culture, leadership engagement), five constructs were identified related to individual characteristics, and eight constructs were identified related to process (e.g., plan, evaluate, and reflect). We present explicit definitions for each construct.ConclusionThe CFIR provides a pragmatic structure for approaching complex, interacting, multi-level, and transient states of constructs in the real world by embracing, consolidating, and unifying key constructs from published implementation theories. It can be used to guide formative evaluations and build the implementation knowledge base across multiple studies and settings.

A citation analysis and scoping systematic review of the operationalization of the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM)

A Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) for Integrating Research Findings into Practice

Applying an equity lens to assess context and implementation in public health and health services research and practice using the PRISM framework

Integrating the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model With Best Practices in Clinical Decision Support Design: Implementation Science Approach

Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework

RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review

Attitude theory and measurement in implementation science: a secondary review of empirical studies and opportunities for advancement

Implementation practice models for development in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review of peer-reviewed literature

The use of the PARIHS framework in implementation research and practice—a citation analysis of the literature

Implementing evidence-based practices in rural settings: a scoping review of theories, models, and frameworks

PRISM: Patient Response Identifiers for Stratified Medicine

Evaluating and optimizing the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) for use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

A systematic review of experimentally tested implementation strategies across health and human service settings: evidence from 2010-2022

Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

Comments, suggestions, and criticisms of the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary-2 design tool: a citation analysis

Resilience Training for Hospital Employees in the Era of COVID-19: A Pilot Study of Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) at Work (RP413)

Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance

The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science

A scoping review of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks — an appraisal of purpose, characteristics, usability, applicability, and testability

PRISM CI: A SOFTWARE SYSTEM TO SUPPORT AGING ADULTS WITH A COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

Vaccine communication training using the Brief Motivational Interviewing for Maternal Immunization intervention: A PRISM implementation evaluation