Abstract:In recent years there has been a drive to embed sustainable development into the Higher Education design curriculum. Within the UK this has been encouraged institutionally through the Engineering Council’s UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence and the Royal Academy of Engineering’s visiting professor scheme. Despite these efforts sustainable development does not appear to have been fully embedded into the design curriculum. Where sustainable development has been introduced it has often been viewed in isolation from the design process, as an add-on, distraction or introduced toward the end of the student’s academic career. Progress is evident with educational approaches involving problem based learning (PBL) and peer assisted learning (PAL) yielding measurable benefits. However, the main focus of activity has been toward the more quantitative aspects of sustainability namely environmental and economic impacts whilst the less tangible qualitative and social factors are ignored. More recently the concept of “social usefulness” has emerged as a means for engaging design engineering students with these aspects of sustainability. To encourage student engagement with the broader elements of sustainable development, particularly in the social sphere, a short course was developed from ongoing research and experience gained from previous programmes. Building upon previous work the compulsory course ran for the first week of the academic year with students involved in no other academic activities. Students were drawn from first and second year cohorts of Design Engineering and placed in small mixed groups with no account taken for prior academic performance. The methodology utilised design analysis as the backbone and each group issued with a different consumer product. Verbal briefs were provided at key stages and although initially limited in detail, the scope and duration expanded as the course progressed. Within this context groups analysed the product from a broad sustainability perspective. This analysis included social usefulness, the functional service provided to the consumer and wider community, the product-service mix and material utilisation. Didactic elements were restricted to short micro-seminars emphasising the underlying concepts with learning delivered through PBL, PAL and student presentations. Learning was reinforced through post presentation discussion sessions and reflective learning accounts which students submitted at pre-defined intervals. Analysis of the presentations and reflective accounts indicated development in the students understanding of sustainability and the relevance to engineering and product design. Students identified the difference between aspirational and inspirational products, how social usefulness can be linked to service and how changes to the product-service mix can improve material utilisation. The use of PBL and PAL encouraged students to develop their own strategies for problem solving and learning better equipping them with the skills required for study within HE and beyond into lifelong learning and continuous professional development. An interesting observation was made in that emotional attachment by the students to the products upon which the activity was based inhibited the students’ ability to consider them objectively. This was unexpected and considered an important learning observation leading the research team to consider adapting the phenomena to both existing and proposed learning programmes.

Contextualising capabilities for public safety in undergraduate sustainability engineering education

Embedding Sustainability Principles into Engineering Education

Inspiring Sustainability in Undergraduate Engineering Programs

Preparing engineering students for the challenges of the SDGs: what competences are required?

Sustainable graduates: linking formal, informal and campus curricula to embed education for sustainable development in the student learning experience

An engineering dilemma: sustainability in the eyes of future technology professionals

Sustainability competencies and skills in software engineering: An industry perspective

Inspiring the Next Generation of Project Managers: Embedding Sustainability in Engineering Projects through Project Management Teaching and Learning

Analysis of Chemical Engineering curriculum to improve process safety competency

Integrating Social Factors Through Design Analysis

Engineering students’ agency beliefs and career goals to engage in sustainable development: differences between first-year students and seniors

Enquiry-based skills education for sustainable development in a UK geography module as a catalyst for organisational change

Contemporary Systems Engineering for the UN SDGs and NAE Grand Challenges

Sustainability Awareness through STEAM+

Shell's Strategic Competence Development: Ensuring Capability and Capacity Building Across the Global Operational Safety Skill Pool

Students’ learning sustainability – implicit, explicit or non-existent: a case study approach on students’ key competencies addressing the SDGs in HEI program

Safety education 4.0 – A critical review and a response to the process industry 4.0 need in chemical engineering curriculum

Individual sustainability competence development in engineering education: Community interaction open-source learning

From problem-based learning to practice-based education: a framework for shaping future engineers

Survival is the driver for adaptation: safety engineering changed the future, security engineering prevented disasters and transition engineering navigates the pathway to the climate-safe future