Sunscreens threaten coral survival

Colleen M Hansel,Colleen M. Hansel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4627

IF: 56.9

2022-05-06

Science

Abstract:Oxybenzone-based sunscreens are increasing the mortality rates of stressed corals

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Dangers of Oxybenzone in Sunscreens on Coral Reefs: Proposed Policy Approaches

Yasmine Florent,Mackenzie Nemoto,Vanessa Pratt,Ana Rowley,Maria Isabel Villegas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg240106

2024-04-29

Journal of Science Policy & Governance

Abstract:Sunscreen was developed to combat the harmful effects of skin exposure to ultraviolet radiation, but organic UV filters like oxybenzone pose a threat to coral reefs by promoting bleaching incidents, damaging coral DNA, and interfering with coral larvae. Oxybenzone has also been found to cause a wide range of reproductive and developmental harm within other marine organisms, like fish and invertebrates. While there are alternative sunscreens that are less detrimental to coral such as mineral-based products, toxic oxybenzone-based sunscreens are still popular among cosmetic companies and consumers. Scientific findings in the past decade have demonstrated a connection between high concentrations of chemical UV filters and the destruction of marine ecosystems. This knowledge has prompted some governments in coastal regions to pass legislation aiming to limit the use of sunscreens containing these chemicals. These regulations provide beneficial case studies that can be used to develop further effective policies to federally ban these products in the United States. The jurisdictions of Hawaii, the US Virgin Islands, and Key West are model examples of successful implementation of such laws domestically. Based on efforts from such coastal communities, our suggested best practices to eliminate the threat posed by harmful sunscreens are to promote alternative sunscreen use, to define ‘reef-safe’ within the Federal Trade Commission’s Green Guides, and to impose a nationwide ban on oxybenzone. These recommendations provide a comprehensive plan to protect the United States’ fragile marine ecosystems.
Conversion of oxybenzone sunscreen to phototoxic glucoside conjugates by sea anemones and corals

Djordje Vuckovic,Amanda I. Tinoco,Lorraine Ling,Christian Renicke,John R. Pringle,William A. Mitch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn2600

IF: 56.9

2022-05-06

Science

Abstract:The reported toxicity of oxybenzone-based sunscreens to corals has raised concerns about the impacts of ecotourist-shed sunscreens on corals already weakened by global stressors. However, oxybenzone's toxicity mechanism(s) are not understood, hampering development of safer sunscreens. We found that oxybenzone caused high mortality of a sea anemone under simulated sunlight including ultraviolet (UV) radiation (290 to 370 nanometers). Although oxybenzone itself protected against UV-induced photo-oxidation, both the anemone and a mushroom coral formed oxybenzone–glucoside conjugates that were strong photo-oxidants. Algal symbionts sequestered these conjugates, and mortality correlated with conjugate concentrations in animal cytoplasm. Higher mortality in anemones that lacked symbionts suggests an enhanced risk from oxybenzone to corals bleached by rising temperatures. Because many commercial sunscreens contain structurally related chemicals, understanding metabolite phototoxicity should facilitate the development of coral-safe products.

multidisciplinary sciences
Sunscreen bans: Coral reefs and skin cancer

Robert B Raffa,Joseph V Pergolizzi Jr,Robert Taylor Jr,Jan M Kitzen,NEMA Research Group

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12778

Abstract:What is known and objective: Hawaii will ban two major ingredients of sunscreens. This article reviews the reasons and future directions. Hawaii recently enacted legislation that will ban the use of two major ingredients of the majority of commonly used sunscreens. The reason for the ban is the ingredients' putative deleterious impact on marine ecosystems, particularly coral reefs. But sunscreens also save lives by decreasing the risk of UV-induced skin cancers. We review both sides of the issue and potential implications for the healthcare system. Comment: Coral reefs consist of organisms in delicate equilibria that are susceptible to small changes in their surroundings. Recent natural and man-made disruptions, direct or indirect, such as changes in ocean temperature and chemistry, ingress of invasive species, pathogens, pollution and deleterious fishing practices, have been blamed for the poor health, or even the outright destruction, of some coral reefs. The most popular sunscreen products contain two ingredients-oxybenzone and octinoxate-that have also been implicated in coral toxicity and will be banned. This creates a healthcare dilemma: Will the protection of coral reefs result in an increase in human skin cancers? What is new and conclusion: Concentration estimates and mechanism studies support an association-direct or indirect (via promotion of viral infection)-of sunscreens with bleaching of coral reefs. A ban on the two most common sunscreen ingredients goes into effect in Hawaii on January 1, 2021. Proponents suggest that this is a trend, just the first of many such bans worldwide; opponents warn of a dire increase in human skin cancers. As a result, alternative sunscreen compounds are being sought.
Toxicopathological Effects of the Sunscreen UV Filter, Oxybenzone (Benzophenone-3), on Coral Planulae and Cultured Primary Cells and Its Environmental Contamination in Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands

C. A. Downs,Esti Kramarsky-Winter,Roee Segal,John Fauth,Sean Knutson,Omri Bronstein,Frederic R. Ciner,Rina Jeger,Yona Lichtenfeld,Cheryl M. Woodley,Paul Pennington,Kelli Cadenas,Ariel Kushmaro,Yossi Loya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-015-0227-7

2015-10-20

Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Abstract:Benzophenone-3 (BP-3; oxybenzone) is an ingredient in sunscreen lotions and personal-care products that protects against the damaging effects of ultraviolet light. Oxybenzone is an emerging contaminant of concern in marine environments—produced by swimmers and municipal, residential, and boat/ship wastewater discharges. We examined the effects of oxybenzone on the larval form (planula) of the coral Stylophora pistillata, as well as its toxicity in vitro to coral cells from this and six other coral species. Oxybenzone is a photo-toxicant; adverse effects are exacerbated in the light. Whether in darkness or light, oxybenzone transformed planulae from a motile state to a deformed, sessile condition. Planulae exhibited an increasing rate of coral bleaching in response to increasing concentrations of oxybenzone. Oxybenzone is a genotoxicant to corals, exhibiting a positive relationship between DNA-AP lesions and increasing oxybenzone concentrations. Oxybenzone is a skeletal endocrine disruptor; it induced ossification of the planula, encasing the entire planula in its own skeleton. The LC50 of planulae exposed to oxybenzone in the light for an 8- and 24-h exposure was 3.1 mg/L and 139 µg/L, respectively. The LC50s for oxybenzone in darkness for the same time points were 16.8 mg/L and 779 µg/L. Deformity EC20 levels (24 h) of planulae exposed to oxybenzone were 6.5 µg/L in the light and 10 µg/L in darkness. Coral cell LC50s (4 h, in the light) for 7 different coral species ranges from 8 to 340 µg/L, whereas LC20s (4 h, in the light) for the same species ranges from 0.062 to 8 µg/L. Coral reef contamination of oxybenzone in the U.S. Virgin Islands ranged from 75 µg/L to 1.4 mg/L, whereas Hawaiian sites were contaminated between 0.8 and 19.2 µg/L. Oxybenzone poses a hazard to coral reef conservation and threatens the resiliency of coral reefs to climate change.

environmental sciences,toxicology
Toxicity of zinc oxide to scleractinian corals and zooxanthellae: a brief review

Lúcio Freitas Neto,Breno Espósito

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21577/0100-4042.20230003

2023-05-09

Quimica Nova

Abstract:Freitas Neto, Lúcio L. ; Espósito, Breno P. ; In recent years, the safety of sunscreens to coral reefs and the role these products would play in the process of coral bleaching has been a concern. However, the discussion centers almost exclusively on the organic components used as UV filters, with little attention given to inorganic UV filters, such as zinc oxide. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) have been a common ingredient of sunscreen formulations for decades and are being discharged in coral reef environments. Even though there are data supporting that ZnO is toxic to certain species of fish and algae, regulatory agencies do not appear concerned with the possible outcome of the exposure of corals and their algal symbionts to this metal oxide. This review compiles the published work on the toxicity of ZnO and ZnO-NPs to corals and zooxanthellae, which strongly supports the notion that zinc oxide is toxic to both corals and microalgae. In view of this, concern has been raised by the use of the "reef safe" label to promote sunscreens that lack specific organic components, however containing ZnO as the major UV filter.
Are Physical Sunscreens Safe for Marine Life? A Study on a Coral-Zooxanthellae Symbiotic System

Shengwu Yuan,Jingying Huang,Wei Qian,Xiaoshan Zhu,Shuhang Wang,Xia Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c04603

IF: 11.4

2023-01-01

Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract:Limited toxic and ecological studies were focused on physical sunscreen that is considered to have "safer performance", in which nanosize zinc oxide (nZnO) and nanosize titanium dioxide (nTiO2) generally are added as ultraviolet filters. Herein, the common button coral Zoanthus sp. was newly used to assess the toxic effects and underlying mechanisms of physical sunscreen. Results showed that physical sunscreen induced severe growth inhibition effects and largely compelled the symbiotic zooxanthellae, indicating that their symbiotic systems were threatened and, also, that neural and photosynthesis functions were influenced. Zn2+ toxicity and bioaccumulation were identified as the main toxic mechanisms, and nTiO2 particles released from physical sunscreen also displayed limited bioattachment and toxicity. Oxidative stress, determined by increased reactive oxygen species, superoxide dismutase, and malondialdehyde content, was indicated as another important toxic mechanism. Furthermore, when Zoanthus sp. was restored, the inhibited individual coral could be largely recovered after a short (3 d) exposure time; however, a longer exposure time damaged the coral irretrievably, which revealed the latent environmental risks of physical sunscreen. This study investigated the toxic effect of physical sunscreen on Zoanthus sp. in a relatively comprehensive manner, thus providing new insights into the toxic response of sunscreen on marine organisms.
Review of environmental effects of oxybenzone and other sunscreen active ingredients

Samantha L Schneider,Henry W Lim,Samantha L. Schneider,Henry W. Lim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.033

IF: 15.487

2019-01-01

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract:With increasing awareness regarding the risks of sunburn, photoaging, and skin cancer, the use of sunscreens has increased. Organic and inorganic filters are used in sunscreen products worldwide. Concerns have been raised regarding the environmental effects of commonly used organic ultraviolet (UV) filters, including oxybenzone (benzophenone-3), 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, octocrylene, and octinoxate (ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate). Studies have identified UV filters such as oxybenzone, octocrylene, octinoxate, and ethylhexyl salicylate in almost all water sources around the world and have commented that these filters are not easily removed by common wastewater treatment plant techniques. Additionally, in laboratory settings, oxybenzone has been implicated specifically as a possible contributor to coral reef bleaching. Furthermore, UV filters such as 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, oxybenzone, octocrylene, and octinoxate have been identified in various species of fish worldwide, which has possible consequences for the food chain. As dermatologists, it is important for us to continue to emphasize the public health impact of excessive sun exposure and advise our patients about proper photoprotection practice, which consists of seeking shade, wearing photoprotective clothing (including hats and sunglasses), and applying appropriate sunscreens.

dermatology
Photochemical response of the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata to some sunscreen ingredients

Jean-Pierre Fel,Catherine Lacherez,Alaa Bensetra,Sakina Mezzache,Eric Béraud,Marc Léonard,Denis Allemand,Christine Ferrier-Pagès

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-018-01759-4

2018-12-29

Coral Reefs

Abstract:Ultraviolet (UV) filters and preservatives, which are common constituents of sunscreens and other cosmetics, are reported as a threat for coastal coral reef ecosystems; however, few studies have assessed the effects of these compounds on coral health. This study presents the chronic effects (of measured, long-term and low concentrations) of some preservatives (ethylparaben, butylparaben), mineral UV filter (zinc oxide, ZnO) and organic UV filters (terephthalylidene dicamphor sulfonic acid, drometrizole trisiloxane, ethylhexyltriazone, butylmethoxydibenzoylmethane and 2-ethylhexyl 2-cyano-3,3-diphenylacrylate) on the maximal photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) of the symbionts associated with the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata. It first shows that for many organic filters, measured concentrations were significantly lower than nominal concentrations, due to the lipophilic nature of the compounds. In addition, the Fv/Fm was more sensitive to ZnO than all other sunscreen ingredients, with exposure to 90 µg L−1 ZnO for 35 d, reducing Fv/Fm by 38% compared with controls. The other UV filters tested showed no adverse effect on coral symbionts or animal tissue up to the concentration corresponding to their water solubility limit (and even above). Similarly, no adverse effect was observed in our conditions with the preservative ethylparaben, but the preservative butylparaben decreased the Fv/Fm by 25% at the highest concentration of 100 µg L−1. None of the sunscreen ingredients were as toxic to corals as the reference pollutants tributyltin, diuron and monuron, which significantly inhibited Fv/Fm at 10, 1 and 0.1 µg L−1, respectively. Overall, this study highlights the need to improve our knowledge on the in situ concentrations of UV filters and preservatives as well as their individual and combined effects on corals.

marine & freshwater biology
Acute toxicity of the UV filter oxybenzone to the coral Galaxea fascicularis

Annaleise J Conway,Michael Gonsior,Cheryl Clark,Andrew Heyes,Carys L Mitchelmore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148666

2021-11-20

Abstract:Coral reefs are impacted by a variety of anthropogenic stressors including inputs of chemical contaminants. Although data is currently limited, sunscreens containing ultraviolet (UV) filters have recently been suggested as an emerging class of chemical contaminants. To provide further data on the toxicity of the UV filter oxybenzone (benzophenone-3 or BP-3) to corals, we conducted three independent acute toxicity tests exposing the colonial stony coral Galaxea fascicularis to BP-3 (0.31 to 10 mg/L nominal concentrations). Assessments included daily analytical verification of the exposure concentrations, calculation of the lethal concentration to result in 50% mortality (LC50) and numerous biological endpoints to further investigate the potential impact to both the coral and symbiont. LC50s for the three tests were similar and averaged 6.53 ± 0.47 mg/L nominal concentration BP-3 (4.45 mg/L measured dissolved BP-3). BP-3 did not initiate coral bleaching or show a significant loss of symbionts from the coral tissue in this species as reductions in measurements used for bleaching (i.e. visual color, color saturation and photosynthetic pigment concentrations) were only seen concurrently with tissue loss (i.e. at ≥2.5 mg/L nominal concentration BP-3). Polyp retraction, the most sensitive endpoint of this test, was seen to be a sub-lethal behavioral response to BP-3 exposure. Using the calculated LC50 with measured concentrations from a high-quality UV filter monitoring study in Hawaii, a preliminary, conservative risk quotient for BP-3 was calculated at 0.032. These results suggest that BP-3 likely does not pose an acute risk of mortality to G. fascicularis and additional testing is required to determine sublethal impacts of BP-3 under environmentally relevant concentrations and longer-term chronic exposures. This study highlights complications in conducting toxicity tests with organic UV filters including under-estimations of exposure concentrations and provides recommendations to improve these methods for better comparisons between studies.
Toxic effects of UV filters from sunscreens on coral reefs revisited: regulatory aspects for “reef safe” products

Ingo B. Miller,Sascha Pawlowski,Matthias Y. Kellermann,Mechtild Petersen-Thiery,Mareen Moeller,Samuel Nietzer,Peter J. Schupp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00515-w

2021-06-26

Environmental Sciences Europe

Abstract:Abstract Background Tropical coral reefs have been recognized for their significant ecological and economical value. However, increasing anthropogenic disturbances have led to progressively declining coral reef ecosystems on a global scale. More recently, several studies implicated UV filters used in sunscreen products to negatively affect corals and possibly contribute to regional trends in coral decline. Following a public debate, bans were implemented on several organic UV filters and sunscreen products in different locations including Hawaii, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Palau. This included banning the widely used oxybenzone and octinoxate, while promoting the use of inorganic filters such as zinc oxide even although their toxicity towards aquatic organisms had been documented previously. The bans of organic UV filters were based on preliminary scientific studies that showed several weaknesses as there is to this point no standardized testing scheme for scleractinian corals. Despite the lack of sound scientific proof, the latter controversial bans have already resulted in the emergence of a new sunscreen market for products claimed to be ‘reef safe’ (or similar). Thus, a market analysis of ‘reef safe’ sunscreen products was conducted to assess relevant environmental safety aspects of approved UV filters, especially for coral reefs. Further, a scientifically sound decision-making process in a regulatory context is proposed. Results Our market analysis revealed that about 80% of surveyed sunscreens contained inorganic UV filters and that there is a variety of unregulated claims being used in the marketing of ‘reef safe’ products with ‘reef friendly’ being the most frequently used term. Predominantly, four organic UV filters are used in ‘reef safe’ sunscreens in the absence of the banned filters oxybenzone and octinoxate. Analysis of safe threshold concentrations for marine water retrieved from existing REACH registration dossiers could currently also safeguard corals. Conclusion There is a substantial discrepancy of treatments of organic versus inorganic UV filters in politics as well as in the ‘reef safe’ sunscreen market, which to this point is not scientifically justified. Thus, a risk-based approach with equal consideration of organic and inorganic UV filters is recommended for future regulatory measures as well as a clear definition and regulation of the ‘reef safe’ terminology.

environmental sciences
Challenges in Current Coral Reef Protection – Possible Impacts of UV Filters Used in Sunscreens, a Critical Review

Mareen Moeller,Sascha Pawlowski,Mechtild Petersen-Thiery,Ingo B. Miller,Samuel Nietzer,Yannik Heisel-Sure,Matthias Y. Kellermann,Peter J. Schupp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.665548

IF: 5.247

2021-04-14

Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract:Coral reefs are highly endangered ecosystems. The identification and quantification of potential stress factors are essential to protect them. UV filters from sunscreens that are introduced to coral reef areas are considered as one of these stressors and their impact on corals needs to be further investigated. Even though UV filters are functionally similar, their structural features are very diverse. Their impact on limnic organisms have also been shown to be highly variable ranging from no or low to high toxicity. It is therefore to be expected that their effect on corals also differs significantly and that each compound has to be evaluated individually. The demand for conclusive benchmarks and guidelines from policy makers and the public over the past years shows the necessity for an objective literature review on the effects of various UV filters on scleractinian corals. Here, we review the present literature, summarize the data on the different UV filters and discuss the different approaches, advantages and limitations of the studies. However, the methods used in the latter studies vary greatly. They differ in many aspects such as species and life stage used, field and laboratory approaches, with exposure times ranging from hours to weeks. Some studies include analytics and measure the actual test concentration, others only provide nominal concentrations. The lack of standardized methods renders comparisons between studies futile. Additionally, most UV filters have only been investigated in a single or a few studies of different quality. Reliable thresholds are therefore impossible to draw on the basis of currently available studies. Nevertheless, certain UV filters repeatedly showed comparable toxicity in both freshwater and marine species tested. Yet, existing differences in results from coral tests emphasize the need for a standardized testing method comparable to those established for other aquatic organisms in order to allow for a more conclusive assessment. In this review, we describe what a scientifically sound testing proposal should include in order to obtain reliable and reproducible data, which ultimately should result in an internationally organized standardized ring test trial. Such standardized toxicity tests would enable validation of coral toxicity data related to UV filters, but also testing of other types of compounds that are known to be introduced and effect coral reefs, thus helping to identify significant stressors and enabling objective policy decisions.

marine & freshwater biology
Sunscreen Safety: a Review of Recent Studies on Humans and the Environment

Brandon L. Adler,Vincent A. DeLeo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-020-00284-4

2020-01-17

Current Dermatology Reports

Abstract:Purpose of ReviewTo provide an up-to-date synopsis of the literature on the safety of sunscreen active ingredients in humans and the environment and highlight regulatory changes in the USA.Recent FindingsCurrently, as per the US Food and Drug Administration, the only ultraviolet filters generally recognized as safe and effective are inorganic zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2). In vivo human systemic absorption studies found that common organic filters attain sufficient plasma concentrations to require carcinogenicity and reproductive studies. In vivo human skin penetration studies showed ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO-NP) did not penetrate the stratum corneum. Limited quantities of TiO2-NP may be absorbed systemically. In laboratory settings, corals exposed to oxybenzone manifested concentration-dependent toxicity and bleaching. In response, bills passed in Hawaii and elsewhere ban sales of oxybenzone-containing sunscreens. ZnO-NP, but not TiO2-NP, caused coral bleaching under controlled conditions.SummaryThe collective knowledge on sunscreen safety is continually evolving, with many preliminary findings. Studies on the effects of systemic absorption of organic filters in humans are forthcoming; importantly, there has been no evidence of harm over decades of use. Organic (less so inorganic) filters caused coral bleaching in controlled environments, but filter concentrations may not have been realistic, and bleaching is predominantly driven by other factors. No present evidence suggests any marketed sunscreens should be avoided. For consumers with concerns, inorganic ZnO and TiO2 are supported by the most reassuring data at the time of writing.
Deciphering mechanisms of UV filter (benzophenone-3)- and high temperature-induced adverse effects in the coral Acropora tenuis, using ecotoxicogenomics

Sakiko Nishioka,Kaede Miyata,Yasuaki Inoue,Kako Aoyama,Yuki Yoshioka,Natsuko Miura,Masayuki Yamane,Hiroshi Honda,Toshiyuki Takagi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176018

2024-09-13

Abstract:Coral reefs are at risk of bleaching due to various environmental and anthropogenic stressors such as global warming and chemical pollutants. However, there is little understanding of stressor-specific mechanisms that cause coral bleaching. Therefore, conducting accurate ecotoxicological risk assessments and deciphering modes of action of potentially deleterious ultraviolet (UV) filters (sunscreen compounds) are crucial issues. In this study, we evaluated the toxicity and bleaching effect of benzophenone-3 (BP-3), which is widely used in sunscreen products, on the reef-building coral Acropora tenuis. Furthermore, to understand differences in UV filter- and temperature-induced adverse effects, a comparative ecotoxicogenomic approach using RNA-seq was integrated into a toxicity test to clarify differences in gene expression changes induced by BP-3 and heat stress (31 °C). The lethal concentration 50 % (LC50) was calculated as 3.9 mg/L, indicating that the aquatic environmental risk on corals posed by BP-3 was low based on the risk assessment in this study. Differentially expressed genes related to oxidative stress and extracellular matrix organization were involved in coral responses to both BP-3 and heat stress, but their patterns differed. Whereas immune and heat-shock responses were activated in response to heat stress, activation of a drug metabolism pathway and several signal transduction pathways were identified in BP-3 treatment groups. Our study enhances understanding of stress responses in corals induced by UV filters and thermal stress. Using potential gene markers identified in this study for eco-epidemiological surveys of stressed corals, we urgently need to develop effective countermeasures.
Alarming the impacts of the organic and inorganic UV blockers on endangered coral's species in the Persian Gulf: A scientific concern for coral protection

Hamidreza Sharifan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100017

2020-01-01

Sustainable Futures

Abstract:Coral reefs provide many benefits to the society, including ecological nest for aquatic species, medicine ingredient, and protection of coastlines from flooding and storms. Organic and inorganic UV filters (UVfs) are key ingredients in a variety of sunscreen and personal care products, which are massively released to natural waters by marine tourism. Reports are alarming UVfs cause fast bleaching of coral reefs in the Persian Gulf at a tiny concentration (less than 10 µl L−1). Here, for the first time, the evidence pertaining to the impacts of UVfs on corals in the Persian Gulf is highlighted. Based on the existing field reports, laboratory experiments and increasing trend f tourism, corals of Kish Island in Iran are seriously threatened. Here, Kish is a study model that highlights the alarming impacts of UVfs on the endangered population of corals in all Gulf countries. This study found a positive relation between the number of visitors to the island and the bleaching rate of stony coral.
Organic ultraviolet filter mixture promotes bleaching of reef corals upon the threat of elevated seawater temperature

Tangtian He,Pi-Jen Liu,Te-Hao Chen,Li-Hsueh Wang,Tung-Yung Fan,Mirabelle M.P. Tsui,Anderson B. Mayfield,Paul K.S. Lam,Margaret B. Murphy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162744

2023-03-18

Abstract:Global reef degradation is a critical environmental health issue that has triggered intensive research on ocean warming, but the implications of emerging contaminants in coral habitats are largely overlooked. Laboratory experiments assessing organic ultraviolet (UV) filter exposure have shown that these chemicals negatively affect coral health; their ubiquitous occurrence in association with ocean warming may pose great challenges to coral health. We investigated both short- (10-day) and long-term (60-day) single and co-exposures of coral nubbins to environmentally relevant organic UV filter mixtures (200 ng/L of 12 compounds) and elevated water temperatures (30 °C) to investigate their effects and potential mechanisms of action. The initial 10-day exposure of Seriatopora caliendrum resulted in bleaching only under co-exposure conditions (compounds + temperature). The 60-day mesocosm study entailed the same exposure settings with nubbins of three species ( S. caliendrum , Pocillopora acuta and Montipora aequituberculata ). Bleaching (37.5 %) and mortality (12.5 %) of S. caliendrum were observed under UV filter mixture exposure. In the co-exposure treatment, 100 % S. caliendrum and P. acuta bleached associating with 100 % and 50 % mortality, respectively, and significant increase of catalase activities in P. acuta and M. aequituberculata nubbins were found. Biochemical and molecular analyses indicated significant alteration of oxidative stress and metabolic enzymes. The results suggest that upon the adverse effects of thermal stress, organic UV filter mixture at environmental concentrations can cause bleaching in corals by inducing a significant oxidative stress and detoxification burden, suggesting that emerging contaminants may play a unique role in global reef degradation.

environmental sciences
Fine-scale geographic risk assessment of oxybenzone sunscreen pollution within Hanauma Bay using hydrodynamic characterization and modeling

Shadan Nasseri Doust,S Abbas Haghshenas,Elizabeth E Bishop,Michael J Risk,C A Downs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167614

2024-01-01

Abstract:Hanauma Bay's coral reef system is threatened by sunscreen pollution. Understanding the hydrodynamic nature of the bay is crucial for understanding the transport and fate of pollutants within the bay. This study conducted a comprehensive hydrodynamic analysis, revealing significant aspects of current patterns and their influence on sunscreen pollutant behavior. The analysis demonstrated the formation of flows that drive currents parallel to the shoreline, resulting in increased pollutant retention time over sensitive reef areas. Direct flushing currents were identified as playing a role in reducing pollution buildup. Particle dynamics analysis highlighted the importance of considering temporal dynamics and their implications for pollutant pathways, particularly through the swash zone during high tide phases. The study identified primary current patterns near the reef area and emphasized the circular behavior within the water body, affecting corals' susceptibility to bleaching in the southwestern part of Hanauma bay. To understand where oxybenzone concentrations were a threat to wildlife, we created a geographic model that integrated ecological risk assessment with hydrodynamic behavior in a given system, which we designate the Risk Quotient Plume - the geographic area where the concentration is above the threat level for a chemical. The study found high oxybenzone concentrations throughout the bay, threatening coral, fish, and algae populations. Oxybenzone's distribution indicated a serious threat to the entire back reef habitat and a hinderance to coral restoration efforts. The study also emphasizes the need to consider the hydrodynamic behavior of pollutants and their interaction with microplastics in the bay. Overall, the findings provide insights into hydrodynamics and pollutant dispersion in Hanauma Bay, supporting effective pollution management and conservation strategies.
Investigating the exposure and impact of chemical UV filters on coral reef ecosystems: Review and research gap prioritization

Yasmine S. D. Watkins,J. Brett Sallach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4411

2021-05-13

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Abstract:Coral reefs are amongst the world's most productive and biologically diverse ecosystems and in recent decades have experienced an unparalleled decline due to various anthropogenically induced stressors. Ultraviolet (UV) filters found within personal care products such as sunscreen are an emerging chemical pollutant with a growing concern of toxicity to reef organisms. In this study a systematic literature review was conducted to [1] determine the current understanding of spatial distribution and occurrence of UV‐filters exposed to the marine environment, [2] synthesise current ecotoxicological thresholds of relevant reef organisms under various UV filter exposures, [3] identify research gaps related to both exposure and toxicity of UV‐filters in coral reef ecosystems. With gaps identified, a survey was developed and distributed to experts in the field representing academic, governmental, not‐for‐profit, and industry researchers in order to prioritise research gaps and inform future research efforts. The survey identified the need for better understanding of the impacts of co‐stressors, long‐term exposure, mixture and degradation product exposure and realistic environmental conditions. Ultimately, this review, will help guide priority research efforts to understand the risks of UV‐filter exposure to coral reef ecosystems.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

environmental sciences,toxicology
UV filters and their impact on marine life: state of the science, data gaps, and next steps

P. Lebaron

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.18198

2022-06-01

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract:Sunscreens containing broad-spectrum ultraviolet (UV) filters play an essential role in protecting the skin against the damage induced by sun overexposure. However, the widespread use of sunscreens and other personal care products containing these filters has led to these compounds being widely detected in the environment and being identified as emerging pollutants in marine waters. Concerns raised by laboratory studies investigating the potential impact of UV filters on coral communities have already led to bans on the use of some sunscreens in a few tourist hotspots. Although UV filter pollution may be just one of the many environmental factors impacting coral health worldwide, the media attention surrounding these studies and the legislative changes may lead patients to question dermatologists about the environmental safety of some sunscreen products. This review provides an overview of current knowledge on the impact of UV filters on marine ecosystems, concentrating on recent studies examining the effects of commonly used filters on organisms at low trophic levels and of how alternative approaches, such as metabolomics, can be used to further assess UV filter ecotoxicity. Current gaps in our knowledge are also discussed, most notably the need to increase our understanding of the longer-term fate and behaviour of UV filters in the marine environment, develop more adapted standardized ecotoxicity tests for a wider range of marine species, and evaluate the impact of UV filters on the marine food web. We then discuss future perspectives for the development of new, more environmentally friendly, filters that may enable the use of the most toxic compounds to be reduced without compromising the effectiveness of sunscreen formulations. Finally, we consider how dermatologists play a key role in educating patients on the need for a balanced approach to sun exposure, sun protection, and conservation of the marine environment.

dermatology
Shading does not lower thermal tolerance in the coral Montipora capitata: implications for conservation intervention

Hugo Ducret,Christopher R Suchocki,Claire E Bardin,Claire J Lewis,Tristan Permentier,Madeleine Hardt,Robert J Toonen,Marc Kochzius,Jean-Francois Flot

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.13.623387

2024-11-15

Abstract:Marine heatwaves trigger severe coral bleaching events that result in dramatic losses of coral reefs worldwide. An increasingly common method used to mitigate coral bleaching is to shade portions of reefs. However, as shaded corals become less exposed to environmental stress, shading has also been hypothesized to lower their thermal tolerance, which would be detrimental for their survival. Here, we investigated how long-term shading modifies the response of Montipora capitata to both light and temperature stressors. After two years of growth, we used the Coral Bleaching Automated Stress System (CBASS) to compare responses of 73% shaded and unshaded corals during 1) temperature stress under ambient light, 2) temperature stress under low light, and 3) ambient temperature with light stress. Results show that shaded corals are less resistant than control ones to light stress and to heat stress under high light, but not to heat stress under low light, where no difference was detected. We further demonstrate that low light intensity during heat stress reduces the decline of photosynthetic efficiency when compared to heat stress at ambient light, regardless of the light history of the coral colonies. Our data support light-mediated stress, both independent of and synergistic with heat-induced stress, and suggest that light and heat stresses trigger different molecular and cellular pathways. We hereby confirm the benefits of coral shading under both short- and long-term temperature stress, and underline the importance of light acclimation in the conservation and restoration of coral reefs.

Ecology
A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals

Carys L. Mitchelmore,Emily E. Burns,Annaleise Conway,Andrew Heyes,Iain A. Davies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4948

2021-02-02

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Abstract:There has been a rapid increase in public, political, and scientific interest regarding the impact of organic ultraviolet (UV) filters to coral reefs. Such filters are found in sunscreens and other consumer products and enter the aquatic environment via direct (i.e., recreational activities, effluents) or indirect (i.e., land runoff) pathways. This review summarizes the current state of the science regarding the concentration of organic UV filters in seawater and sediment near coral reef ecosystems and in coral tissues, toxicological data from early and adult life stages of coral species, and preliminary environmental risk characterizations. Up to 14 different organic UV filters in seawater near coral reefs have been reported across 12 studies, with the majority of concentrations in the nanograms per liter range. Nine papers report toxicological findings from no response to a variety of biological effects occurring in the micrograms per liter to milligrams per liter range, in part given the wide variations in experimental design and coral species and/or life stage used. This review presents key findings; scientific data gaps; flaws in assumptions, practice, and inference; and a number of recommendations for future studies to assess the environmental risk of organic UV filters to coral reef ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;00:1–22. © 2021 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

environmental sciences,toxicology

Sunscreens threaten coral survival

Dangers of Oxybenzone in Sunscreens on Coral Reefs: Proposed Policy Approaches

Conversion of oxybenzone sunscreen to phototoxic glucoside conjugates by sea anemones and corals

Sunscreen bans: Coral reefs and skin cancer

Toxicopathological Effects of the Sunscreen UV Filter, Oxybenzone (Benzophenone-3), on Coral Planulae and Cultured Primary Cells and Its Environmental Contamination in Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands

Toxicity of zinc oxide to scleractinian corals and zooxanthellae: a brief review

Are Physical Sunscreens Safe for Marine Life? A Study on a Coral-Zooxanthellae Symbiotic System

Review of environmental effects of oxybenzone and other sunscreen active ingredients

Photochemical response of the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata to some sunscreen ingredients

Acute toxicity of the UV filter oxybenzone to the coral Galaxea fascicularis

Toxic effects of UV filters from sunscreens on coral reefs revisited: regulatory aspects for “reef safe” products

Challenges in Current Coral Reef Protection – Possible Impacts of UV Filters Used in Sunscreens, a Critical Review

Sunscreen Safety: a Review of Recent Studies on Humans and the Environment

Deciphering mechanisms of UV filter (benzophenone-3)- and high temperature-induced adverse effects in the coral Acropora tenuis, using ecotoxicogenomics

Alarming the impacts of the organic and inorganic UV blockers on endangered coral's species in the Persian Gulf: A scientific concern for coral protection

Organic ultraviolet filter mixture promotes bleaching of reef corals upon the threat of elevated seawater temperature

Fine-scale geographic risk assessment of oxybenzone sunscreen pollution within Hanauma Bay using hydrodynamic characterization and modeling

Investigating the exposure and impact of chemical UV filters on coral reef ecosystems: Review and research gap prioritization

UV filters and their impact on marine life: state of the science, data gaps, and next steps

Shading does not lower thermal tolerance in the coral Montipora capitata: implications for conservation intervention

A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals