Development of an Emergency Department Safety Checklist through a global consensus process
Lucrezia Rovati,Daniele Privitera,Alexander S. Finch,John M. Litell,Autumn M. Brogan,Aysun Tekin,Claudia Castillo Zambrano,Yue Dong,Ognjen Gajic,Bo E. Madsen,for the CERTAIN ED Study Group,Hong Hieu Truong,Nasrin Nikravangolsefid,Mahmut Can Ozkan,Amos Lal,Oguz Kilickaya,Alexander S. Niven,Emily Aaronson,Derar H. Abdel-Qader,Divya E. Abraham,Pablo Aguilera,Saima Ali,Maryam Bahreini,Anish Baniya,Fernanda Bellolio,Jochen Bergs,Hjalti Mar Bjornsson,Alberto Bonfanti,Jesica Bravo,Caitlin S. Brown,Basil Bwambale,Nicolò Capsoni,Enrique Casalino,Lucas B. Chartier,Sandeep N. David,Sagun Dawadi,Mirko Di Capua,Melis Efeoglu,Leila Eidinejad,Doris Eis,Ulf Ekelund,Cenker Eken,Yonathan Freund,Brian Gilbert,Davide Giustivi,Shamai Grossman,Saïd Hachimi Idrissi,Kim Hansen,Chorng-Kuang How,Katrin Hruska,Aamir Ghafoor Khan,Henrik Laugesen,Lars Erik Laugsand,Lawrence Kule,Le Thi Thanh Huong,Mate Lerga,Marta Macias Maroto,Nataša Mavrinac,Walter Menacho Antelo,Nalan M. Aksu,Tatjana Mileta,Talayeh Mirkarimi,Victor Mkanyu,Neema Mnape,Afif Mufarrij,Muhammed Elhady Muhammed Elgasim,Visnja Nesek Adam,Tran Ngoc Thuy Hang,Nguyen Xuan Ninh,Seyedeh Zahra Nouri,Kei Ouchi,Sowjanya Patibandla,Pham Tien Ngoc,Ingrid Prkačin,Emma Redfern,Alejandro-Antonio Rendón Morales,Roberta Scaglioni,Lindy Scholten,Belinda Scott,Nima Shahryarpour,Optatus Silanda,Lucas Silva,Tiong Beng Sim,Ksenija Slankamenac,Jonathan Sonis,Maša Sorić,Yuqiang Sun,Nguyen Thai Tri,Tran Viet Quoc,Salim Kemal Tunceri,Joseph Turner,Marie C. Vrablik,Mohamed Wali,Xiaoxv Yin,Sana Zafar,Abedi S. Zakayo,Jian-cang Zhou,Didi Delalic,Sveva Anchise,Marta Colombo,Marco Bettina,Laura Ciceri,Fausto Fazzini,Rossella Guerrieri,Valeria Tombini,Annalisa Geraneo,Annamaria Mazzone,Cristina Alario,Elisa Bologna,Eugenia Rocca,Giorgio Parravicini,Greta Li Veli,Ilaria Paduanella,Marianna Sanfilippo,Matteo Coppola,Michela Rossini,Simone Saronni
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03760-y
2024-10-02
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Abstract:Emergency departments (EDs) are at high risk for medical errors. Checklist implementation programs have been associated with improved patient outcomes in other high-risk clinical settings and when used to address specific aspects of ED care. The aim of this study was to develop an ED Safety Checklist with broad applicability across different international ED settings. A three-round modified Delphi consensus process was conducted with a multidisciplinary and multinational panel of experts in emergency medicine and patient safety. Initial checklist items were identified through a systematic review of the literature. Each item was evaluated for inclusion in the final checklist during two rounds of web-based surveys and an online consensus meeting. Agreement for inclusion was defined a priori with a threshold of 80% combined agreement. Eighty panel members from 34 countries across all seven world regions participated in the study, with comparable representation from low- and middle-income and high-income countries. The final checklist contains 86 items divided into: (1) a general ED Safety Checklist focused on diagnostic evaluation, patient reassessment, and disposition and (2) five domain-specific ED Safety Checklists focused on handoff, invasive procedures, triage, treatment prescription, and treatment administration. The checklist includes key clinical tasks to prevent medical errors, as well as items to improve communication among ED team members and with patients and their families. This novel ED Safety Checklist defines the essential elements of high-quality ED care and has the potential to ensure their consistent implementation worldwide.
medicine, general & internal