Abstract 15494: Characterization of Adiponectin Kinetics and Adiponectin R2 Pathway in Thp-1 Macrophages and Foam Cells

Anouar HafianeJean-Claude BertrandStella S DaskalopoulouExperimental Medecine,McGill Univ,Montreal,Canada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.146.suppl_1.15494
IF: 37.8
2022-11-01
Circulation
Abstract:Circulation, Volume 146, Issue Suppl_1, Page A15494-A15494, November 8, 2022. Background:Adiponectin (APN) is an adipokine most abundantly secreted by adipocytes and possesses vasculoprotective properties. We and others have previously showed that APN receptor 2 (adipoR2) pathway is impaired in foam cells when compared to macrophages. Nevertheless, the functional role of adipoR2 pathway in foam cells has not been fully investigated. We hypothesize that APN kinetics involving AdipoR2 and its subsequent downstream signaling peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) expression are altered in foam cells when compared to macrophages.Methods:We used THP-1 human macrophage-derived foam cells loaded with oxidized LDL (60μg/ml) and 3H-cholesterol (2μCi/ml) versus control macrophages. APN isomers and PPAR-α protein expression were detected by gradient SDS-PAGE, and Western blotting, respectively. Media cell cultures mixtures were analysed under protease inhibitor by a size-exclusion centrifugal filter molecular weight cut-off 10 kDa.Results:PPAR-α activation significantly increased in APN-treated macrophages (24h) when compared with APN-treated foam cells (24h) with a maximum fold difference of 1.90±1.21, p=0.002 at 10μg APN/mL (PPAR-α: β actin ratio, spectral count; n=10 repeats for each). As a result, in foam cells, APN stimulated PPAR-α with a lower Km molar efficiency (0.06 ± 0.13 μM) and lower velocity Vmax 0.67±0.08 /h-as compared to macrophages (0.023±0.02 μM and 1.37±0.11 /h respectively, p=0.01 for both). In macrophages, APN had smaller dissociation constant Kd (0.037±0.56 μM) than in foam cells (0.10±1.30 μM). APN increased significantly PPAR-α activity rate over time reaching a maximum of 2h, with 1.19±0.02 PPAR-α protein expression in macrophages vs 0.85±0.057 in foam cells. Additionally, the APN dimer/monomer ratio increased over 24h when compared to foam cells, reaching a maximum at 2h in macrophages. Strong correlations were noted between PPARα and APN dimers: in macrophages (r=0.85; p=0.006) and in foam cells (r=0.68, p=0.05).Conclusion:APN stimulates PPARα activity in macrophages, but significantly less in foam cells (weaker kinetic affinity process), suggesting that APN interaction and binding with adipoR2 and subsequent downstream PPARα expression are affected in foam cells.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?