Abstract:Background Current approaches fail to separate patients at high versus low risk for ventricular arrhythmias owing to overreliance on a snapshot left ventricular ejection fraction measure. We used statistical machine learning to identify important cardiac imaging and time‐varying risk predictors. Methods and Results Three hundred eighty‐two cardiomyopathy patients (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance before primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion. The primary end point was appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge or sudden death. Patient characteristics; serum biomarkers of inflammation, neurohormonal status, and injury; and cardiac magnetic resonance‐measured left ventricle and left atrial indices and myocardial scar burden were assessed at baseline. Time‐varying covariates comprised interval heart failure hospitalizations and left ventricular ejection fractions. A random forest statistical method for survival, longitudinal, and multivariable outcomes incorporating baseline and time‐varying variables was compared with (1) Seattle Heart Failure model scores and (2) random forest survival and Cox regression models incorporating baseline characteristics with and without imaging variables. Age averaged 57±13 years with 28% women, 66% white, 51% ischemic, and follow‐up time of 5.9±2.3 years. The primary end point (n=75) occurred at 3.3±2.4 years. Random forest statistical method for survival, longitudinal, and multivariable outcomes with baseline and time‐varying predictors had the highest area under the receiver operating curve, median 0.88 (95% CI, 0.75‐0.96). Top predictors comprised heart failure hospitalization, left ventricle scar, left ventricle and left atrial volumes, left atrial function, and interleukin‐6 level; heart failure accounted for 67% of the variation explained by the prediction, imaging 27%, and interleukin‐6 2%. Serial left ventricular ejection fraction was not a significant predictor. Conclusions Hospitalization for heart failure and baseline cardiac metrics substantially improve ventricular arrhythmic risk prediction. Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms LGE late gadolinium enhancement RF‐SLAM random forest survival, longitudinal and multivariate outcomes SCD sudden cardiac death SI signal intensity Clinical Perspective What Is New? In primary prevention implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients, an interim hospitalization for heart failure identified a group at high risk for subsequent ventricular arrhythmia defined as an appropriate ICD shock. Among ICD recipients without heart failure hospitalizations, baseline cardiac magnetic resonance imaging metrics (specifically, left ventricle heterogeneous gray and total scar, left ventricle and left atrial volumes, and left atrial total emptying fraction) as well as serum interleukin‐6 levels were the strongest predictors of subsequent appropriate ICD shock; serial left ventricle ejection fraction did not provide additional prognostic value for the arrhythmic outcome. Machine learning statistical methods may improve risk score development by accounting for complex and dynamic interactions among risk variables and temporally varying risk. What Are the Clinical Implications? The combination of clinical heart failure course, baseline cardiac magnetic resonance imaging metrics, and levels of the inflammatory biomarker interleukin‐6 can most accurately stratify subsequent high versus low ventricular arrhythmic risk and may be useful for decision‐making as primary prevention ICD recipients approach elective generator change. Identifying patients most at risk for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a clinical challenge. 1 Current guidelines directing the use of primary prevention implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICDs) rely on a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), which has low predictive efficiency. 1 Estimated annualized rates of appropriat -Abstract Truncated-

Abstract 11629: Multicenter Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Risk Model to Predict Right Ventricular Failure Following Mechanical Circulatory Support: The STOP-RVF Score

Multicenter Validated RVF Risk Score to Predict Right Ventricular Failure After Mechanical Circulatory Support

Improving the Prediction of 1 Year Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

The Incremental Value of Right Ventricular Size and Strain in the Risk Assessment of Right Heart Failure Post - Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Abstract 15339: Prediction of Severe Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricle Assist Device Using Echocardiographic Right Ventricular Dp/dt

Predictors of Right vEntricular Failure aftER LVAD implantation: PREFER LVAD study

Derivation and validation of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute heart failure

Creation and Validation of a Novel Sex-Specific Mortality Risk Score in LVAD Recipients

Pulmonary Vascular Resistance to Predict Right Heart Failure in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

The Right Ventricular-Arterial Compliance Index: A Novel Hemodynamic Marker to Predict Right Heart Failure Following Left Ventricular Assist Device

Multiparametric right ventricular assessment improves risk stratification in patients with new-onset acute heart failure

Development and Validation of a Practical Model to Identify Patients at Risk of Bleeding after TAVR

Impact of Right Ventricular Dysfunction on Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative

Risk factors for the development of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation—a single-centre retrospective with focus on deformation imaging†

Right ventricular dysfunction in left ventricular assist device candidates: is it time to change our prospective?

Right heart failure with left ventricular assist devices: Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative management strategies. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC

MELD-XI Predicts Severe Right Ventricular Failure after HeartMate 3 Implantation in a Contemporary Cohort

Abstract 16723: A Machine Learning Approach to Acute Heart Failure Risk Stratification

Tissue-Based Predictors of Impaired Right Ventricular Strain in Coronary Artery Disease: A Multicenter Stress Perfusion Study

Baseline and Dynamic Risk Predictors of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Right Ventricular Longitudinal Strain Predicts Mortality in Patients Undergoing TAVI