Abstract:Mitochondria are dynamic and plastic, undergoing continuous fission and fusion and rearrangement of their bioenergetic sub‐compartments called cristae. These fascinating processes are best understood in animal and fungal models, which are taxonomically grouped together in the expansive Opisthokonta supergroup. In opisthokonts, crista remodelling and inner membrane fusion are linked by dynamin‐related proteins (DRPs). Animal Opa1 (optical atrophy 1) and fungal Mgm1 (mitochondrial genome maintenance 1) are tacitly considered orthologs because their similar mitochondria‐shaping roles are mediated by seemingly shared biochemical properties, and due to their presence in the two major opisthokontan subdivisions, Holozoa and Holomycota, respectively. However, molecular phylogenetics challenges this notion, suggesting that Opa1 and Mgm1 likely had separate, albeit convergent, evolutionary paths. Herein, we illuminate disparities in proteolytic processing, structure, and interaction network that may have bestowed on Opa1 and Mgm1 distinct mechanisms of membrane remodelling. A key disparity is that, unlike Mgm1, Opa1 directly recruits the mitochondrial phospholipid cardiolipin to remodel membranes. The differences outlined herein between the two DRPs could have broader impacts on mitochondrial morphogenesis. Outer and inner membrane fusion are autonomous in animals, which may have freed Opa1 to repurpose its intrinsic activity to remodel cristae, thereby regulating the formation of respiratory chain supercomplexes. More significantly, Opa1‐mediated crista remodelling has emerged as an integral part of cytochrome c‐regulated apoptosis in vertebrates, and perhaps in the cenancestor of animals. By contrast, outer and inner membrane fusion are coupled in budding yeast. Consequently, Mgm1 membrane‐fusion activity is inextricable from its role in the biogenesis of fungal lamellar cristae. These disparate mitochondrial DRPs ultimately may have contributed to the different modes of multicellularity that have evolved within Opisthokonta.

Mechanical instability generated by Myosin 19 contributes to mitochondria cristae architecture and OXPHOS

OPA1 and MICOS Regulate Mitochondrial Crista Dynamics and Formation.

Myosin-19 and Miro regulate mitochondria-endoplasmatic reticulum contacts and mitochondria inner membrane architecture

MIRO-1 interacts with VDAC-1 to regulate mitochondrial membrane potential in <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>

Tensile Forces and Shape Entropy Explain Observed Crista Structure in Mitochondria

Sam50–Mic19–Mic60 Axis Determines Mitochondrial Cristae Architecture by Mediating Mitochondrial Outer and Inner Membrane Contact

Regulation of mitochondrial structure by the actin cytoskeleton

Mitochondrial Cristae Morphology Reflecting Metabolism, Superoxide Formation, Redox Homeostasis, and Pathology

The mitochondrial inner membrane protein mitofilin controls cristae morphology.

Mitochondrial inner membrane remodeling as a driving force of organelle shaping

MICOS assembly controls mitochondrial inner membrane remodeling and crista junction redistribution to mediate cristae formation

Cristae shaping and dynamics in mitochondrial function

In situ architecture of Opa1-dependent mitochondrial cristae remodeling

Molecular and Supramolecular Structure of the Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation System: Implications for Pathology

Kinetic coupling of the respiratory chain with ATP synthase, but not proton gradients, drives ATP production in cristae membranes

Protein-Induced Membrane Strain Drives Supercomplex Formation

Nanoscale details of mitochondrial constriction revealed by cryoelectron tomography

Molecular mechanisms of mitochondrial dynamics

Regulation of Mitochondrial Structure and Dynamics by the Cytoskeleton and Mechanical Factors

Bringing together but staying apart: decisive differences in animal and fungal mitochondrial inner membrane fusion

High-resolution Structures of Mammalian Mitochondrial Respiratory Supercomplexes in Reaction within Native Mitochondria