Fat-forming Variant of Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Mediastinum.
Liu Xi,Zhang Hong-ying,Bu Hong,Meng Guo-zhao,Zhang,Ke Qi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200706010-00019
2007-01-01
Abstract:Fat-forming variant of solitary fibrous tumor (fat-forming variant of SFT), previously called lipomatous hemangiopericytoma (L-HPC), is a recently recognized rare variant of solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) with unpredictable biologic behavior. Fat-forming variant of SFT occurs predominately in the deep soft tissues of the lower extremities. Histologically, it is composed of an admixture of benign hemangiopericytomatous and lipomatous components. Up to now, only 37 cases have been reported in the English literature worldwide1–7 and the molecular analyses are sparse. Reported herein is the first Chinese case of fat-forming variant of SFT. Although one case of fat-forming variant of SFT in the mediastinum was briefly reported,2 this is the first case in the region with detailed histologic, immunohistochemical features and flow cytometric DNA analysis. This study focused on characterizing the clinicopathologic features of fat-forming variant of SFT to promote the recognition of this rare entity for both clinicians and pathologists. CASE REPORT Clinical findings A 61-year-old man presented with a 5-year history of numbness related to his right lower quadrant. His past medical history and family history was unremarkable. The lesion was discovered fortuitously at the time of medical examination. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a large mass measuring approximately 10 cm in diameter at the right posterior mediastinum. The laboratory data were within normal limits. The patient underwent a surgery in July, 2004. At surgery, the tumor was completely resected in view of the clinical suspicion of liposarcoma. At the most recent follow-up 28 months later, there was no evidence of recurrence or metastasis. Pathological findings Gross The lesion removed from the right posterior mediastinum measured 9.5 cm×6.0 cm×6.0 cm and was pedunculated. Grossly, it was well-circumscribed, lobulated and covered by connective tissue. The consistency was soft and rubbery. The cut surface of the mass revealed a vague multinodular and tan-white appearance admixed with soft fatty regions (Fig. 1).Fig. 1.: The tumor is well delineated and shows the contrast between the pale tan cellular regions, and the yellow lipid-rich foci on the cut section.Light microscopy The tumor was well-circumscribed and surrounded by a thin fibrous tissue. It showed a lobular growth pattern and consisted of cellular nodules with the classic appearance of hemangiopericytoma admixed with lobules of mature adipocytes (Fig. 2). The hemangiopericytomatous regions were characterized by branching thin-walled capillary and sinusoidal vessels that have a staghorn configuration (Fig. 3). In some areas, the lesion exhibited interstitial hyalinization in varied degrees bearing some resemblance with SFT. Oval to spindle cells with bland nuclei arranged in a random fashion surrounded the vessels. The cells had moderate amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm. The nuclei were oval, and mitotic figures were rarely seen. Notably, the lipomatous regions were identified throughout the lesion and varied from lobules to foci of mature adipocytes; however, no lipoblasts were identified. Small foci of myxoid change and scattered inflammatory cells were noted (Fig. 4). The tumor did not display necrosis or vascular invasion.Fig. 2.: The tumor is surrounded by a thin fibrous capsule and composed of an admixture of hemangiopericytoma and lipomatous elements (Hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification×20).Fig. 3.: The hemangiopericytomatous regions within the tumor show characteristic staghorn branching vascular pattern. Interstitial hyalinization is present focally (Hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification×50).Fig. 4.: Myxoid areas and small foci of inflammatory cells are visible. (Hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification×50).Immunohistochemical findings The neoplastic spindle (nonadipocytic) cells were strongly and diffusely positive for vimentin (Dakopatts, Glostrup, Denmark), and CD99 (Dako) (Fig. 5A). In some areas, stains for CD34 (Zymed, South SanFrancisco, USA) (Fig. 5B), and bc1–2 (Dako) were positive whereas HMB45 (Dako), desmin (Dako), and S100-protein (Dako) were negative.Fig. 5.: Immunoreactivities of different markers in the tumor. A: Diffuse and strong positive staining of CD99 (Originalmagnification×100). B: Positive staining of CD34 in some cells (Original magnification×200).MIB-1 (Zymed) stained only <1% (1000 cells counted). Smooth muscle actin (Dako) stained only the blood vessels. The adipocytes demonstrated positive staining for S100-protein (Dako), but were negative for all the remaining antibodies. Flow cytometric DNA analysis Flow cytometry was performed according to the method reported by Hedley et al.8 All cells analyzed showed diploid: diploid G1, 78.7%; diploid G2, 12.9%; and diploid S-phase fraction (SPF), 8.3% (% confidence variable (CV): 7.2, cell debris 3.9%; Fig. 6).Fig. 6.: DNA histogram of LHPC cells obtained by flow cytometric DNA analysis.DISCUSSION Fat-forming variant of SFT, classified by WHO (2002),9 is a rare variant of SFT. In 1995, Nielsen et al1 initially reported three cases of a distinctive tumor composed of an admixture of hemangiopericytoma and mature adipose tissue, for which they coined the term L-HPC in English literature. However, this rare so-called L-HPC was first reported in the German literature by Theunissen et al10 in 1990. In 2000, Guillou et al2 noted that L-HPCs and SFTs share similar clinical, pathologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural features, except for the presence of mature adipocytes, and suggested that L-HPC is likely to represent a fat-containing variant of SFT. Recently, Gengler and Guillou11 proposed again the evolution of the concept. Since its initial description, to our knowledge, there have been only about 37 cases published in the English literature worldwide.1–7 Of the total of 38 cases, including the case in this context, the age of the patients ranged from 27 to 75 years (median 51 years; average 52.7 years). Fifteen patients (39.5%) were females and 23 (60.5%) males. Fat-forming variant of SFTs had a wide anatomical distribution, but the common sites affected were the lower extremities (28.9%). Other sites (71.1%) included retroperitoneum, neck, chest wall, thyroid, mediastinum, elbow, iliac fossa, poplitea fossa, epicardium, orbit, and abdominal wall. Most of the cases were located in the deep soft tissue. The size of these lesions ranged from 1.7 cm to 21 cm. Grossly, all tumors presented as a single, well-delineated lesion. On cut surface, most of them presented tan-white in color. Histologically, all the neoplasms were characterized by the areas of hemangiopericytoma admixed with mature fat. Oval to spindle cells surrounded large, staghorn vessels. In a minority of cases, however, perivascular and interstitial hyalinization was present focally around vessels, as in our case. In all cases, cellularity was low and atypia and mitotic activity was less than four mitoses per 10 high-power fields in the pericytic areas. Neither necrosis nor vascular invasion was present in nearly all cases. Lipoblasts were not identified either. Immunohistochemically, the nonadipocytic tumor cells were consistently positive for CD99 and, less frequently, for CD34 (75%) and bc1–2 (60%), as in our case.1–7 Ultrastructurally, they showed features of fibroblastic/myofibroblastic differentiation, similar to conventional SFT.11 Fat-forming variant of SFT can be confused with other soft tissue tumors, including liposarcoma, spindle cell lipoma (SCL), dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) and conventional hemangiopericytoma with normal fat trapping. The gross pathology is suggestive of a fat-containing tumor, giving the clinical impression of a lipomatous tumor. In fact, in our study, the initial clinical diagnosis was liposarcoma. Liposarcoma, especially the myxoid variant, can have a prominent vasculature. It may be confused with fat-forming variant of SFT particularly if only limited fine-needle aspiration biopsy material is available.3 Vascular configuration should be served as a useful clue in the distinction between these two lesions. The vessels in myxoid liposarcoma demonstrate a delicate plexiform capillary vascular network, unlike the staghorn pattern of fat-forming variant of SFT. Furthermore, all of fat-forming variant of SFTs are devoid of lipoblasts. Well-differentiated liposarcoma has broad fibrous septa containing atypical cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and a varying number of lipoblasts.12 Dedifferentiated liposarcoma usually shows some areas of high grade non-lipogenic malignancy. Although both SCL and fat-forming variant of SFT are composed of bland-appearing spindle cells, the former has short bundles of wiry collagen and lacks the staghorn vasculature of varying caliber found in fat-forming variant of SFT. In addition, presence of extensive myxoid background admixed with scattered mast cells is more common in SCL than that in fat-forming variant of SFT.13 Whereas both fat-forming variant of SFT and DFSP can share CD34 positivity, the former can be differentiated from the latter by the lack of classic storiform growth pattern. In addition, DFSP diffusely infiltrates the dermis and invades into subcutaneous tissue, unlike fat-forming variant of SFT. Hemangiopericytoma with normal fat trapping also should be considered in the differential diagnosis. However, these tumors do not represent conventional hemangiopericytoma with normal fat trapping, because fat-forming variant of SFT has been reported in locations where adipose tissue is not contained (e.g. sinonasal passages).1 Moreover, in most cases, including our case, the tumor was encapsulated or had pseudocapsule formation, and the distribution of fat was relatively throughout the tumor, which suggests that fat was an integral component of the neoplasm. In the literature, all the tumors were surgically excised. Although in one case reported by Theunissen et al10 the tumor allegedly recurred and was designated “malignant” and the surgical margins of some cases were positive for tumor microscopically, most of them appear to be indolent, with no recurrences or metastases noted, including ours. Moreover, the very low nuclear proliferation index measured by MIB-1 in our case, is consistent with the clinically indolent course of the tumor. In addition, in our case, by flow cytometry, all tumor cells showed diploid, with the S-phase fraction being 8.3%. Despite the limited follow-up information, we suspect fat-forming variant of SFT to be a benign and slowly growing mesenchymal neoplasm. The information suggested surgical excision with tumor-free margins is the treatment of choice for this lesion. However, more cases of fat-forming variant of SFT should be studied to have a definitive conclusion about the management and prognosis of this rare lesion.