The Comprehensive Adversity Measure (CAM): A measure of early adversity and its severity
Pascal Schlechter,Nina Marie Lutz,Nexhmedin Morina,Jon Grant,Christine Lochner,Samuel Chamberlain,Paul Wilkinson,Jessica Fritz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/nq7dc
IF: 4.863
2024-10-31
Child Abuse & Neglect
Abstract:Early adversity (EA) scales often display insufficient content coverage and typically assess the presence of adversity, but not its severity. To address some of these limitations, we developed the 13-item Youth and Childhood Adversity Scale. We subsequently revised and expanded the scale regarding content coverage and item wording, resulting in a 22-item version, which we here validate in one cross-sectional (N = 1498; 43.9% females; 24.42 years old, SD = 3.72, range 18-30 years) and in one longitudinal study (N = 1084; 39.6% females; 32 years old, SD = 10.49, range 18-75 years). To reflect the nature of the revised measure more accurately, it was named the Comprehensive Adversity Measure (CAM). Exploratory factor analysis suggested a one-factor model for both the presence/absence and the severity facet, which both displayed good model fit in subsequent confirmatory factor analyses. Factor models demonstrated at least scalar measurement invariance across gender and country (US/UK). Validity of the CAM was supported by significant correlations with psychological distress, depression, anxiety, substance use, posttraumatic stress symptoms, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, suicide attempts, rumination, social comparison, self-esteem, and quality of life – concurrently and prospectively. Overall, the CAM offers a psychometrically-sound, content-wise comprehensive, and free to use assessment of EA.
family studies,psychology, social,social work