Abstract:Background: There is much interest in virtual consultations using video technology. Randomized controlled trials have shown video consultations to be acceptable, safe, and effective in selected conditions and circumstances. However, this model has rarely been mainstreamed and sustained in real-world settings. Objective: The study sought to (1) define good practice and inform implementation of video outpatient consultations and (2) generate transferable knowledge about challenges to scaling up and routinizing this service model. Methods: A multilevel, mixed-method study of Skype video consultations (micro level) was embedded in an organizational case study (meso level), taking account of national context and wider influences (macro level). The study followed the introduction of video outpatient consultations in three clinical services (diabetes, diabetes antenatal, and cancer surgery) in a National Health Service trust (covering three hospitals) in London, United Kingdom. Data sources included 36 national-level stakeholders (exploratory and semistructured interviews), longitudinal organizational ethnography (300 hours of observations; 24 staff interviews), 30 videotaped remote consultations, 17 audiotaped face-to-face consultations, and national and local documents. Qualitative data, analyzed using sociotechnical change theories, addressed staff and patient experience and organizational and system drivers. Quantitative data, analyzed via descriptive statistics, included uptake of video consultations by staff and patients and microcategorization of different kinds of talk (using the Roter interaction analysis system). Results: When clinical, technical, and practical preconditions were met, video consultations appeared safe and were popular with some patients and staff. Compared with face-to-face consultations for similar conditions, video consultations were very slightly shorter, patients did slightly more talking, and both parties sometimes needed to make explicit things that typically remained implicit in a traditional encounter. Video consultations appeared to work better when the clinician and patient already knew and trusted each other. Some clinicians used Skype adaptively to respond to patient requests for ad hoc encounters in a way that appeared to strengthen supported self-management. The reality of establishing video outpatient services in a busy and financially stretched acute hospital setting proved more complex and time-consuming than originally anticipated. By the end of this study, between 2% and 22% of consultations were being undertaken remotely by participating clinicians. In the remainder, clinicians chose not to participate, or video consultations were considered impractical, technically unachievable, or clinically inadvisable. Technical challenges were typically minor but potentially prohibitive. Conclusions: Video outpatient consultations appear safe, effective, and convenient for patients in situations where participating clinicians judge them clinically appropriate, but such situations are a fraction of the overall clinic workload. As with other technological innovations, some clinicians will adopt readily, whereas others will need incentives and support. There are complex challenges to embedding video consultation services within routine practice in organizations that are hesitant to change, especially in times of austerity.

Videoconference clinics improve efficiency of inflammatory bowel disease care in a remote and rural setting

Exploring the Experiences of Virtual Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care in Saskatchewan

Web-based videoconferencing for rural palliative care consultation with elderly patients at home

Exploration of patient and clinician experience of video consultations in community palliative care

INCREASING ACCESS TO INTERDISCIPLINARY IBD CARE FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED IBD PATIENTS USING TELEMEDICINE: AN EXTENSION OF THE COMPASS-IBD PROGRAM

Time, cost and carbon-efficiency: a silver lining of COVID era virtual urology clinics?

The inflammatory bowel disease live interinstitutional and interdisciplinary videoconference education (IBD LIVE) series

Real-World Implementation of Video Outpatient Consultations at Macro, Meso, and Micro Levels: Mixed-Method Study

Remote Consultations Versus Standard Face-to-Face Appointments for Liver Transplant Patients in Routine Hospital Care: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of myVideoClinic

Telehealth Interventions Delivering Home-based Support Group Videoconferencing: Systematic Review

Remote Consultations Versus Standard Face-to-Face Appointments for Liver Transplant Patients in Routine Hospital Care: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of myVideoClinic (Preprint)

P801 Umbrella review of effectiveness of digital technologies for the management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

IBD goes home: from telemedicine to self-administered advanced therapies

A stepped wedge trial of efficacy and scalability of a virtual clinical pharmacy service (VCPS) in rural and remote NSW health facilities

Benefits of implementing a rapid access clinic in a high-volume inflammatory bowel disease center: Access, resource utilization and outcomes

Transitioning patients from intravenous to subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab for inflammatory bowel disease: what is the opportunity cost of improving access to healthcare?

329-OR: Videoconferencing for Diabetes Self-Management Support—A Viable Option for Meeting the Needs of High-Risk Patients in Rural Areas?

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Hospitalizations are Similar for Patients Receiving Tele-Visit Delivered Outpatient Care and Those Receiving Traditional In-Person Care

P620 A cost-effective Inflammatory Bowel Disease flare management pathway utilising rapid access intestinal ultrasound and nurse-led triage to achieve hospital avoidance with increased patient satisfaction

Telemedicine broadening access to care for complex cases

Experiences and satisfaction of video follow up of children with paediatric gastrointestinal conditions linking tertiary centre with guardians and clinicians at the local hospital: a cross-sectional study