Fair street space allocation: ethical principles and empirical insights
Felix Creutzig,Aneeque Javaid,Zakia Soomauroo,Steffen Lohrey,Nikola Milojevic-Dupont,Anjali Ramakrishnan,Mahendra Sethi,Lijing Liu,Leila Niamir,Christopher Bren d’Amour,Ulf Weddige,Dominic Lenzi,Martin Kowarsch,Luisa Arndt,Lulzim Baumann,Jody Betzien,Lesly Fonkwa,Bettina Huber,Ernesto Mendez,Alexandra Misiou,Cameron Pearce,Paula Radman,Paul Skaloud,J. Marco Zausch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1762795
IF: 10.185
2020-05-18
Transport Reviews
Abstract:Urban street space is increasingly contested. However, it is unclear what a fair street space allocation would look like. We develop a framework of ten ethical principles and three normative perspectives on street space – <i>streets for transport</i>, <i>streets for sustainability</i>, and <i>streets as place</i> – and discuss 14 derived street space allocation mechanisms. We contrast these ethically grounded allocation mechanisms with real-world allocation in 18 streets in Berlin. We find that car users, on average, had 3.5 times more space available than non-car users. While some allocation mechanisms are more plausible than others, none is without disputed normative implications. All of the ethical principles, however, suggest that on-street parking for cars is difficult to justify, and that cycling deserves more space. We argue that ethical principles should be systematically integrated into urban and transport planning.
transportation