Abstract 10905: Relationship of Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid Dosage to Plaque Progression in Patients With Coronary Atherosclerosis Receiving Statin and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Therapy

John P SheppardSuvasini LakshmananSion K RoyDeepak L BhattMatthew J BudoffJohn R NelsonYale New Haven Hosp,New Haven,CTCardiovascular Medicine,Univ of Iowa Hosps and Clinics,IACardiology,Lundquist Institute/Harbor-UCLA Med Cntr,Torrance,CABrigham and Women's Hosp/Harvard Med Sch,Boston,MALundquist Institute/Harbor-UCLA Med Cntr,Torrance,CACalifornia Cardiovascular Institute,Fresno,CA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.146.suppl_1.10905
IF: 37.8
2022-11-01
Circulation
Abstract:Circulation, Volume 146, Issue Suppl_1, Page A10905-A10905, November 8, 2022. Introduction:Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) extensively studied in atherosclerosis. Clinical endpoint and imaging studies have yielded convergent findings favoring pure EPA over mixed EPA/DHA formulations. The effects of EPA and DHA dose on coronary plaque dynamics, however, remain unknown, and could yield insights into the utility of these PUFAs in coronary artery disease.Methods:We considered longitudinal studies that compared coronary plaque change in patients receiving statin versus statin+PUFA therapy. Outcomes were % change in total and lipid plaque volume. Treatment effects were calculated as standardized mean difference (SMD), the mean % plaque volume change between statin and statin+PUFA cohorts divided by their pooled standard error. To isolate effects of EPA or DHA dose respectively, treatment arms were pooled by dosage of the PUFA of interest. To account for dependent samples, we fit hierarchical mixed effects models using robust variance estimation, assuming a correlation of 0.5 among treatment effects within multi-arm studies.Results:Among 555 screened articles, 11 studies met inclusion criteria. Among 1,070 patients, there were 14 treatment arms stratified by EPA dose, and 15 treatment arms stratified by DHA dose. Meta-regression revealed that EPA dose (g/day) correlated positively with treatment effect (β = 0.3 [0.1, 0.6], P = 0.02), while daily DHA dose correlated negatively with treatment effect (β = -0.4 [-0.7, -0.1], P = 0.01). We found no associations between EPA (β = 0.1 [-0.2, 0.4], P = 0.44) or DHA (β = -0.1 [-0.3, 0.2], P = 0.59) dose and treatment effects for lipid volume (Figure 1).Conclusions:Among cohorts receiving statin+PUFA therapy, we found a dose-dependent benefit of administered EPA on coronary plaque volume; the opposite was true for DHA. This adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting DHA may blunt beneficial effects of EPA in atherosclerosis.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?