Residual Intraocular Perfluorodecalin Masquerading As a Retained Intraocular Foreign Body: How to Differentiate by Simple Measures
David T.L. Liu,Alex H. Fan,Vincent Y.W. Lee,Dennis S.C. Lam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01361.x
2010-01-01
Acta Ophthalmologica
Abstract:Editor, Perfluorodecalin (C10F18) is a fluorocarbon liquid of high specific gravity and low viscosity. It is a common intraoperative adjunct in complicated vitreoretinal surgeries. Although perfluorodecalin (PFD) is meant to be removed as completely as possible, small amounts may remain in the vitreous cavity (Winter et al. 1999). Residual PFD assumes droplet form because of its high surface tension. We report a case of a residual PFD droplet mimicking a retained intraocular foreign body (IOFB) and the radiographic, ultrasonic and computed tomographic (CT) features that helped to differentiate the two. A 59-year-old man had a penetrating ocular injury in his left eye. Emergency surgery was performed to retrieve the metallic IOFB (an iron nail head), and lensectomy and corneal wound repair were carried out. Perfluorodecalin was used and removed at the end of surgery. In the immediate postoperative period, left vitreous haemorrhage pre-empted adequate examination. Ultrasonography was performed to assess the subject’s retinal status and showed an unexpectedly small echogenic lesion on the dependent part of the retina. This echogenic lesion was characterized by a chain of post-acoustic, re-vibrating echogenic artefacts (Fig. 1). Ultrasonography (A and B scans) in the left eye, showing vitreous haemorrhage within which is a small, highly echogenic lesion, characterized by post-acoustic, re-vibrating echogenic artefacts. Because of the possibility of retained IOFB, plain radiography (X-ray) and CT of the orbit were performed. No radiopaque lesion could be demonstrated by plain X-ray. Computed tomography of the orbit with the patient lying supine showed a roundish, hyperdense lesion with a sharp margin and smooth contour in the dependent part of the left vitreous cavity (Fig. 2A). Computed tomography of the orbit was repeated in the left decubitus. This supine−decubitus manoeuvre showed that the hyperdense lesion had shifted to a new dependent position (Fig. 2B). No radiological metallic streak artefact was present. In view of its radiolucency in plain X-ray, its ability to move, its smooth contour and the lack of any metallic streak artefact, the ‘lesion’ was regarded as a residual PFD droplet. No immediate exploratory surgery was attempted. The vitreous haemorrhage gradually reabsorbed. Indirect ophthalmoscopy confirmed a small PFD droplet in the left vitreous cavity. The residual PFD droplet was removed during a second-stage intraocular lens implantation procedure carried out 4 months later. Computed tomography scans of the orbit. (A) When the patient was in a supine position, CT showed a small hyperdense lesion with sharp margin and smooth contour in the dependent part of the left vitreous cavity, in contact with the retina. (B) When the patient was in a left lateral position, CT showed the hyperdense lesion had shifted to a new dependent position. No metallic streak artefacts were present in the vicinity of the lesion. Our case illustrates a difficult scenario in which a residual PFD droplet deceptively mimicked a retained IOFB in a patient with a history of penetrating ocular injury, in whom thorough clinical examination was precluded because of vitreous haemorrhage, as it would also be in the presence of a small pupil or gas in the vitreous cavity. Appropriate imaging and simple manoeuvres may provide important clues. Although both a metallic foreign body and a PFD droplet are highly echogenic in ultrasonic examination, the former should be radiopaque and the latter radiolucent in plain X-ray. An IOFB, when in contact with the retina, usually induces inflammatory reactions which limit its mobility. The PFD droplet, by contrast, is inert and has a smooth surface, which allows for relatively good mobility on the retinal surface (Chang et al. 1998). We demonstrated this feature by using CT to establish that the PFD droplet was able to move. Moreover, a PFD droplet does not have any metallic streak artefact. All these radiological features help to differentiate a residual PFD droplet from a retained IOFB. As a result, unnecessary surgical exploration in a traumatized eye can be minimized.