Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of preferences when small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are confronted with the practical problems associated with implementing frequent and large-scale changes to their working policies and practices. This paper aims to alleviate some of the concerns as claimed in positioning and change agency theory by introducing “preferential role positioning” to organizational change. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a qualitative case study approach and change agency and positioning theories to find out the extent to which staff and management experienced the practical difficulties and challenges and what resolution actions they took. Eighty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2004/2005 and 2011 with the staff and management of four SMEs in the UK. An interpretative analysis was conducted on the case data in the tradition of Husserl and Schutz. In the first set, participants were asked to elucidate the difficulties faced in their roles and how these were experienced whilst the second focused on impacts and strategies. Three independent researchers reviewed and interpreted the qualitative data and helped with the coding and thematization. Findings This paper's main results are based on the data's three stages showing how SME members chose to deal with the practical difficulties namely “new structures and procedures” (stage 1); “new ways of communicating” (stage 2) and “new collaborations” (stage 3). The combination of the stages' aspects led to the emergence of “preferential role positioning” as the study's theoretical contribution to the gap on preferences in organizational change research. Research limitations/implications The eighty-five interviews from UK-based SMEs constrained the sample size thereby limiting the number of questionnaire categories asked. The findings and their analysis cannot be generalized to non-SMEs that seek to address similar difficulties. Practical implications Managers need to be aware of the adverse impacts of using draconian, top-down disciplinary and punishment measures/structures as a way to implement change. Other practical lessons include the fact that managers should contextualize people's anxieties, dissatisfaction, resistance and disengagement as a platform from which social knowledge can be generated with all change agents in order to resolve implementation challenges in the longer term. Staff developed the ability to deal with some practical issues such as navigating through the new departmental structures, new working procedures and new ways of talking with management and with each other to implement change more successfully. Social implications The social value of the findings demonstrates that preferences can be imported from other social science disciplines into Organizational Studies to show the value of what people can contribute and how they choose to do so (i.e. via what discourse, using what types of interactions and capabilities to do so). In addition, the results show that management need to consider employees in their plans as they try to implement change firstly to facilitate greater interaction and success, secondly to minimize implementation difficulties and thirdly as a recognition that there are multiple change agents and multiple role-enacting positions in developing sociological knowledge that can be of value. Originality/value This study's three-stage approach has shown that a successful implementation and management of change in SMEs should also include a bottom-up recognition of the difficulties, adversities, conflicts and tensions and a resolution to deal with the structural and communicative constraints via dialogue and “preferential role positioning”.

Taking open answers seriously: gaining insights into the perilous undercurrent of organizational change

Staff preferences in four SMEs experiencing organizational change

Systematic RADaR analysis of responses to the open-ended question in the Culture of Care Barometer survey of a Dutch hospital

Joint analyses of open comments and quantitative data: Added value in a job satisfaction survey of hospital professionals

The workers' perspective: emotional consequences during a lean manufacturing change based on VSM analysis

Taken Out of Context: Hazards in the Interpretation of Written Assessment Comments

Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, registered nurses and assistant nurses

Lean healthcare from a change management perspective

The Need for Dual Openness to Change: A Longitudinal Study Evaluating the Impact of Employees’ Openness to Organizational Change Content and Process on Intervention Outcomes

Part Change Management: A Case Study on Automotive Engineering and Production; Domestic and International Perspectives

Organizational assessments to drive strategic planning in changing work environments

Lean Management and Breakthrough Performance Improvement in Health Care

Software Engineers' Attitudes Towards Organizational Change - an Industrial Case Study

A novel conceptual approach to lean: value, psychological conditions for engagement with work and perceived organizational support in hospital care

Reflections: our Journey in Organizational Change Research and Practice

Changing the culture of assessment: the dominance of the summative assessment paradigm

Insight in cultural change during organizational transformation: a case study

Stairway to heaven or a placebo: the impact of lean leadership, through job demands, on hospital workers' engagement and performance

Exploring the sociocultural contexts in which healthcare staff respond to and use online patient feedback in practice: In-depth case studies of three NHS Trusts

A theoretical framework of organizational change

What do you think of when you hear the word ‘feedback’? A reflective thematic analysis study of interviews