Abstract:Objectives: Low-value care can harm patients and healthcare systems. Despite a decade of global endeavours, low value care has persisted. Identification of barriers and enablers is essential for effective deimplementation of low-value care. This scoping review is an evidence summary of barriers, enablers and features of effective interventions for deimplementation of low-value care in emergency medicine practice worldwide. Design: A mixed-methods scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Data sources: Medline, CINAHL, Embase, EMCare, Scopus and grey literature were searched from inception to 5 December 2022. Eligibility criteria: Primary studies which employed qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods approaches to explore deimplementation of low-value care in an EM setting and reported barriers, enablers or interventions were included. Reviews, protocols, perspectives, comments, opinions, editorials, letters to editors, news articles, books, chapters, policies, guidelines and animal studies were excluded. No language limits were applied. Data extraction and synthesis: Study selection, data collection and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Barriers, enablers and interventions were mapped to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment. Results: The search yielded 167 studies. A majority were quantitative studies (90%, 150/167) that evaluated interventions (86%, 143/167). Limited provider abilities, diagnostic uncertainty, lack of provider insight, time constraints, fear of litigation, and patient expectations were the key barriers. Enablers included leadership commitment, provider engagement, provider training, performance feedback to providers and shared decision-making with patients. Interventions included one or more of the following facets: education, stakeholder engagement, audit and feedback, clinical decision support, nudge, clinical champions and training. Multifaceted interventions were more likely to be effective than single-faceted interventions. Effectiveness of multifaceted interventions was influenced by fidelity of the intervention facets. Use of behavioural change theories such as the Theoretical Domains Framework in the published studies appeared to enhance the effectiveness of interventions to deimplement low-value care. Conclusion: High-fidelity, multifaceted interventions that incorporated education, stakeholder engagement, audit/feedback and clinical decision support, were administered daily and lasted longer than 1 year were most effective in achieving deimplementation of low-value care in emergency departments. This review contributes the best available evidence to date, but further rigorous, theory-informed, qualitative and mixed-methods studies are needed to supplement the growing body of evidence to effectively deimplement low-value care in emergency medicine practice.

Identifying drivers of health care value: a scoping review of the literature

Psychosocial factors contributing to value creation in value-based healthcare: a scoping review

Scoping Review: Anesthesiologist Involvement in Alternative Payment Models, Value Measurement, and Nonclinical Capabilities for Success in the United States of America

Unravelling Elements of Value of Healthcare and Assessing their Importance Using Evidence from Two Discrete-Choice Experiments in England

How can the healthcare system deliver sustainable performance? A scoping review

Moving from Principles to Practice: A Scoping Review of Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) Implementation Strategies

Value of Care: An Exploratory Qualitative Study with Doctors and Patients

Unraveling elements of value-based pricing from a pharmaceutical industry's perspective: a scoping review

Value-based digital health: A systematic literature review of the value elements of digital health care

What works for and what hinders deimplementation of low-value care in emergency medicine practice? A scoping review

Identifying potentially low value surgical care: A national ecological study in England

Measuring Value in Health Care: A Comparative Analysis of Value-based Frameworks

Facilitating and Inhibiting Factors in the Design, Implementation, and Applicability of Value-Based Payment Models: A Systematic Literature Review

Key Factors that Promote Low-Value Care: Views of Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands

Challenging the status quo: a scoping review of value-based care models in cardiology and electrophysiology

Exploring potential drivers of patient engagement with their health data through digital platforms: A scoping review

Consumers' Perceptions And Choices Related To Three Value-Based Insurance Design Approaches

Towards Efficient Value-Based Healthcare Measurement Across Hospital Care Pathways - A Scoping Review

Payer perceptions and use of value assessment tools in the United States

Key Factors in the Implementation of Value‐Based Healthcare Performance Evaluation in General Hospitals Healthcare Groups: A Mixed Methodology Study

The Value of Nursing: a Literature Review