Effects of Baikal EM-1 on the Ecological State of Haplic Chernozem with Oil, Crude Oil, and Gasoline Pollution

A. S. Ruseva,T. V. Minnikova,S. I. Kolesnikov,S. Yu. Revina,N. A. Evstegneeva,D. A. Trufanov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367422050081
2022-10-28
Russian Agricultural Sciences
Abstract:Pollution of haplic chernozem with oil, crude oil, and gasoline is one of the most serious and difficult to clean up anthropogenic disturbances, which leads to the withdrawal of large plots of land from agricultural use. The research was carried out to study the effectiveness of the Baikal EM-1 microbiological preparation on the state of haplic chernozem contaminated with oil, crude oil, and gasoline. Pollution was modeled under laboratory conditions by introduction of each pollutant in the amount of 5% of the soil weight. For soil remediation, the Baikal EM-1 microbiological preparation was applied at recommended ( D ), half the recommended ( D 0.5 ), and twice the recommended ( D 2 ) doses. Physicochemical (pH, content of highly soluble salts, redox potential, and hydrophobicity) and biological (phytotoxicity, activity of catalase and dehydrogenases enzymes, and the total number of bacteria) soil parameters were determined before and after the introduction of the remediating agents. Pollution with oil and the petroleum products does not lead to an increase in soil pH to values exceeding the neutral and does not affect the content of highly soluble salts but is accompanied by a change from the oxidation to reduction conditions and increase in soil hydrophobicity. Application of Baikal EM-1 promotes the activity of dehydrogenases only in the variant with gasoline-polluted chernozems. The preparation promotes an increase in the abundance of bacteria in soils polluted with crude oil and gasoline as well as oil at a dose of D 2 . Crude oil proves to be the most toxic pollutant, while gasoline was the least toxic. According to the soil IBI (integrated biological index), the Baikal EM-1 most effectively restores an ecological state when applied at the recommended dose ( D ) under the oil pollution (by 12% compared to the control) and a dose D 0.5 under pollution with crude oil and gasoline (by 39 and 11%, respectively). The results support the use of Baikal EM-1 in situ under soil pollution with oil, crude oil, and gasoline.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?