Abstract:Background: Whether bridging treatment combining intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is superior to direct EVT alone for emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation is unknown. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to investigate and assess the effect and safety of bridging treatment vs . direct EVT in patients with LVO in the anterior circulation. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library were searched to assess the effect and safety of bridging treatment and direct EVT in LVO. Functional independence, mortality, asymptomatic and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aICH and sICH, respectively), and successful recanalization were evaluated. The risk ratio and the 95% CI were analyzed. Results: Among the eight studies included, there was no significant difference in the long-term functional independence (OR = 1.008, 95% CI = 0.845–1.204, P = 0.926), mortality (OR = 1.060, 95% CI = 0.840–1.336, P = 0.624), recanalization rate (OR = 1.015, 95% CI = 0.793–1.300, P = 0.905), and the incidence of sICH (OR = 1.320, 95% CI = 0.931–1.870, P = 0.119) between bridging therapy and direct EVT. After adjusting for confounding factors, bridging therapy showed a lower recanalization rate (effect size or ES = −0.377, 95% CI = −0.684 to −0.070, P = 0.016), but there was no significant difference in the long-term functional independence (ES = 0.057, 95% CI = −0.177 to 0.291, P = 0.634), mortality (ES = 0.693, 95% CI = −0.133 to 1.519, P = 0.100), and incidence of sICH (ES = −0.051, 95% CI = −0.687 to 0.585, P = 0.875) compared with direct EVT. Meanwhile, in the subgroup analysis of RCT, no significant difference was found in the long-term functional independence (OR = 0.927, 95% CI = 0.727–1.182, P = 0.539), recanalization rate (OR = 1.331, 95% CI = 0.948–1.867, P = 0.099), mortality (OR = 1.072, 95% CI = 0.776–1.481, P = 0.673), and sICH incidence (OR = 1.383, 95% CI = 0.806–2.374, P = 0.977) between patients receiving bridging therapy and those receiving direct DVT. Conclusion: For stroke patients with acute anterior circulation occlusion and who are eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, there is no significant difference in the clinical effect between direct EVT and bridging therapy, which needs to be verified by more randomized controlled trials.

Abstract 13170: Mechanical Thrombectomy or Bridging Therapy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes?

Mild and Moderate Cardioembolic Stroke Patients May Benefit More from Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy Than Bridging Therapy: A Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial (DIRECT-MT).

Ncog-18. Meta-Analysis Of Direct Endovascular Thrombectomy Vs Bridging Therapy In The Management Of Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Prior Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Safety and Efficacy of Direct Thrombectomy Versus Bridging Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Eligible for Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Bridging Thrombolysis Versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke Due to Basilar Artery Occlusion

Comparison of Prior Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis With Direct Endovascular Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Thrombolysis plus Mechanical Thrombectomy versus Mechanical Thrombectomy Alone in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis

Mechanical Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials

Real-world setting comparison of bridging therapy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis

Abstract 44: DEVT: Endovascular Treatment Alone versus Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment in Stroke

The Efficacy and Safety of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Posterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion as Compared to Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion: A Systematic Review

Bridge Mechanical Thrombectomy May Be a Better Choice for Acute Large Vessel Occlusions

Bridging the Gap: Improving Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcomes with Intravenous Thrombolysis Prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy

Bridging Therapy Versus Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke due to Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion: A Clinical- Histological Analysis of Retrieved Thrombi

Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Distal Medium Vessel Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multinational Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study

Intravenous Thrombolysis before Thrombectomy may Increase the Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage inTreating Carotid T Occlusion

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke Due to Large-Vessel Occlusion Presenting With Mild Symptoms

Mechanical thrombectomy versus intravenous alteplase alone in acute isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion: a systematic review

Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis Prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy According to the Location ...

Abstract TP192: Combined Intra-Venous and Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis versus Intra-Venous Thrombolysis Alone in Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis