Abstract:Increasing evidence suggests that state policies impact constituents' health, but political determinants of health and health inequities remain understudied. Using state and year fixed-effects models, we determined the extent to which changes in electoral partisan bias in lower chambers of U.S. state legislatures (i.e., discrepancy between statewide vote share and seat share) were followed by changes in five state policies affecting children and families (1980-2019) and a composite of safety net programs (1999-2018). We examined effects on each policy and whether the effect was modified when bias was accompanied by unified party control. Next, we determined whether the effect differed depending on which party it favored. Less bias resulted only in higher AFDC/TANF benefits. Both pro-Democratic and pro-Republican bias was followed by decreased AFDC/TANF benefits and increased Medicaid benefits. AFDC/TANF recipients, unemployment benefits, minimum wage, and pre-K-12 education spending increased following pro-Democratic bias and decreased following pro-Republican bias. Estimated effects on the composite measure of safety net policies were all close to null. Some effects were modulated by unified party control. Results demonstrate that increasing fairness in elections is not a panacea by itself for increasing generosity of programs affecting children's well-being. Indeed, bias can be somewhat beneficial for the expansiveness of some policies. Furthermore, with the exception of unemployment benefits and AFDC/TANF recipients, Democrats have not been using the additional power that comes with electoral bias to spend more on major programs that benefit children. Finally, after decades in which electoral bias was in Democrats' favor, bias has started to shift toward Republicans in the last decade. This trend forecasts more cuts in almost all the policies in this study, especially education and AFDC/TANF recipients. There is a need for more research and advocacy emphasis on the political determinants of social determinants of health, especially at the state level.

More Money Is Not Enough: (Re)Considering Policy Proposals to Increase Federal Funding for Special Education

Examining Family Testimonials for the Reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act

America’s “Great Equalizer”? Modern Trends in Education Funding Disparities and New Policy Solutions

Effective Special Education: A United States Dilemma

Reducing Excellence Gaps: A Systematic Review of Research on Equity in Advanced Education

The Economics of Preschool Special Education Under Public Law 99–457

Expanding Law- and Policy-Relevant Discourse Within Special Education Research

Reported Policies, Guidance, and Related Resources for the Determination of Special Education and Related Services

Obstacles and Opportunities: Some Simple Economics of School Finance Reform

Delivering Medicaid Mental Health Services and Supports in Schools: Current Landscape and Opportunities to Expand

A Refocus on IDEA: Challenges With the Least Restrictive Environment in Physical Education

The Case for Early, Targeted Interventions to Prevent Academic Failure

States' Accountability for Facilitating Parent Involvement under IDEA

Special Education Teacher Shortage: Differences Between High and Low Shortage States

Is inclusive education for children with special educational needs and disabilities an impossible dream?

The Fundamentals of Special Education Policy: Implications for Music Teachers and Music Teacher Education

A Call for Amicus Briefs as a Means to Influence Special Education Policy: Lessons Learned From Endrew F.

National Trends in Special Education and Academic Outcomes for English Learners With Disabilities

Is fair representation good for children? effects of electoral partisan bias in state legislatures on policies affecting children's health and well-being

Policy Considerations for Twice-Exceptional Students

What Are High-Leverage Practices for Special Education Teachers and Why Are They Important?