Abstract:The estimation of the correct number of dimensions is a long-standing problem in psychometrics. Several methods have been proposed, such as parallel analysis (PA), Kaiser-Guttman's eigenvalue-greaterthan-one rule, multiple average partial procedure (MAP), the maximum-likelihood approaches that use fit indexes as BIC and EBIC and the less used and studied approach called very simple structure (VSS). In the present paper a new approach to estimate the number of dimensions will be introduced and compared via simulation to the traditional techniques pointed above. The approach proposed in the current paper is called exploratory graph analysis (EGA), since it is based on the graphical lasso with the regularization parameter specified using EBIC. The number of dimensions is verified using the walktrap, a random walk algorithm used to identify communities in networks. In total, 32,000 data sets were simulated to fit known factor structures, with the data sets varying across different criteria: number of factors (2 and 4), number of items (5 and 10), sample size (100, 500, 1000 and 5000) and correlation between factors (orthogonal, .20, .50 and .70), resulting in 64 different conditions. For each condition, 500 data sets were simulated using lavaan. The result shows that the EGA performs comparable to parallel analysis, EBIC, eBIC and to KaiserGuttman rule in a number of situations, especially when the number of factors was two. However, EGA was the only technique able to correctly estimate the number of dimensions in the four-factor structure when the correlation between factors were .7, showing an accuracy of 100% for a sample size of 5,000 observations. Finally, the EGA was used to estimate the number of factors in a real dataset, in order to compare its performance with the other six techniques tested in the simulation study.

Structured Factor Analysis: A Data Matrix-Based Alternative Approach to Structural Equation Modeling

Semi-Confirmatory Factor Analysis for High-Dimensional Data with Interconnected Community Structures

A Comparative Study on Parameter Recovery of Three Approaches to Structural Equation Modeling: A Rejoinder

Generalized Structured Component Analysis Accommodating Convex Components: A Knowledge-Based Multivariate Method with Interpretable Composite Indexes

Dynamic Sparse Factor Analysis

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH

A Comparative Study on Parameter Recovery of Three Approaches to Structural Equation Modeling

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), and Set-ESEM: Optimal Balance Between Goodness of Fit and Parsimony

Sparse matrix methods for unbalanced multifactor analysis of variance and covariance

Statistical properties of matrix decomposition factor analysis

Causality on cross-sectional data: Stable specification search in constrained structural equation modeling

A comparative study of the predictive power of component-based approaches to structural equation modeling

Best practices for your confirmatory factor analysis: A JASP and lavaan tutorial

Competing Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models in Management Research: Bifactor Modeling of the Employee Work Assessment Tool

Algebraic Problems in Structural Equation Modeling

Inferring Covariance Structure from Multiple Data Sources via Subspace Factor Analysis

Accelerated Structured Matrix Factorization

Bayesian factor selection in a hybrid approach to confirmatory factor analysis

On the Behavior of Fit Indices for Adjudicating Between Exploratory Structural Equation and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models

Exploratory graph analysis: a new approach for estimating the number of dimensions in psychological research

Distributionally weighted least squares in structural equation modeling.