Abstract:Pollinators utilize floral resources that vary in colour, scent and reward quality. Variation in such traits, including nectar rewards, in addition to cues associated with their quality, can influence pollinator foraging decisions with consequences for pollinator reproductive success. Nectar is commonly subject to colonization by micro‐organisms capable of affecting a suite of traits important for pollinator attraction and fitness; yet, links between microbial presence and changes in pollinator preference and performance remain few. Here, we evaluated the effects of a nectar‐inhabiting micro‐organism on pollinator foraging behaviour and reproduction using the common eastern bumblebee Bombus impatiens and the cosmopolitan nectar yeast Metschnikowia reukaufii. Using a combination of choice and no‐choice behavioural and feeding assays, we manipulated the presence and viability of M. reukaufii in nectar and assessed bumblebee foraging and reproductive responses. Bombus impatiens workers responded positively to the presence of yeasts. Foragers trained to associate yeast presence with flower colour visited a significantly greater proportion of flowers inoculated with yeast when subject to a colour discrimination test. Moreover, foragers naïve to nectar yeasts incorporated more yeast‐inoculated flowers into initial foraging bouts when presented with a novel floral array. In addition, bees spent significantly longer foraging on yeast‐inoculated flowers compared to yeast‐free flowers. However, when we manipulated yeast presence and viability in microcolonies of queenless workers, we found no effect of yeast on components of bumblebee reproduction, such as initiation of egg laying and number of eggs laid. This lack of an effect of yeast persisted even under conditions of pollen limitation. Taken together, these results suggest that nectar yeasts can enhance floral signalling and alter pollinator foraging behaviour at individual flowers, though they may not directly affect pollinator performance. Thus, nectar yeasts may play a significant role in mediating pollinator foraging behaviour, with consequences for plant fitness and evolution of floral traits. Lay Summary

Potential effects of nectar microbes on pollinator health

Consequences of a nectar yeast for pollinator preference and performance

Plant secondary metabolites in nectar: impacts on pollinators and ecological functions

Microbial Co-Occurrence in Floral Nectar Affects Metabolites and Attractiveness to a Generalist Pollinator

Contrasting effects of yeasts and bacteria on floral nectar traits

Floral nectar microbial communities exhibit seasonal shifts associated with extreme heat: Potential implications for climate change and plant-pollinator interactions

Floral Phytochemistry: Impact of Volatile Organic Compounds and Nectar Secondary Metabolites on Pollinator Behavior and Health

Elevated Temperature May Affect Nectar Microbes, Nectar Sugars, and Bumble Bee Foraging Preference

The impact of yeast presence in nectar on bumble bee behavior and fitness

Nontarget impacts of neonicotinoids on nectar‐inhabiting microbes

Honey Bees Avoid Nectar Colonized by Three Bacterial Species, But Not by a Yeast Species, Isolated from the Bee Gut

The floral interface: a playground for interactions between insect pollinators, microbes, and plants

Nectar yeasts: a natural microcosm for ecology

Neuroactive nectar: compounds in nectar that interact with neurons

Effects of live yeasts and their metabolic products on bumble bee microcolony development

Presence of yeasts in floral nectar is consistent with the hypothesis of microbial-mediated signaling in plant-pollinator interactions

Environmental Effects on Bee Microbiota

The role of non-volatile chemicals of floral rewards in plant-pollinator interactions

Influence of Pollen Nutrition on Honey Bee Health: Do Pollen Quality and Diversity Matter?

The honeybee microbiota and its impact on health and disease

Plant species vary in nectar peroxide, an antimicrobial defense tolerated by some bacteria and yeasts