Comparison of four handheld point-of-care ultrasound devices by expert users

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-022-00274-6
2022-07-07
The Ultrasound Journal
Abstract:Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is rapidly becoming ubiquitous across healthcare specialties. This is due to several factors including its portability, immediacy of results to guide clinical decision-making, and lack of radiation exposure to patients. The recent growth of handheld ultrasound devices has improved access to ultrasound for many clinicians. Few studies have directly compared different handheld ultrasound devices among themselves or to cart-based ultrasound machines. We conducted a prospective observational study comparing four common handheld ultrasound devices for ease of use, image quality, and overall satisfaction. Twenty-four POCUS experts utilized four handheld devices (Butterfly iQ+TM by Butterfly Network Inc., KosmosTM by EchoNous, Vscan AirTM by General Electric, and LumifyTM by Philips Healthcare) to obtain three ultrasound views on the same standardized patients using high- and low-frequency probes. Data were collected from 24 POCUS experts using all 4 handheld devices. No single ultrasound device was superior in all categories. For overall ease of use, the Vscan AirTM was rated highest, followed by the LumifyTM. For overall image quality, LumifyTM was rated highest, followed by KosmosTM. The LumifyTM device was rated highest for overall satisfaction, while the Vscan AirTM was rated as the most likely to be purchased personally and carried in one’s coat pocket. The top 5 characteristics of handheld ultrasound devices rated as being “very important” were image quality, ease of use, portability, total costs, and availability of different probes. In a comparison of four common handheld ultrasound devices in the United States, no single handheld ultrasound device was perceived to have all desired characteristics. POCUS experts rated the LumifyTM highest for image quality and Vscan AirTM highest for ease of use. Overall satisfaction was highest with the LumifyTM device, while the most likely to be purchased as a pocket device was the Vscan AirTM. Image quality was felt to be the most important characteristic in evaluating handheld ultrasound devices.
English Else
What problem does this paper attempt to address?