Abstract: Groundwater DNAPL contamination source-sink analysis (GDCSA) has seldom been included in previous research on groundwater DNAPL contamination. In this study, a complete GDCSA research system was first established to include groundwater DNAPL contamination source identification (GDCSI), groundwater DNAPL contamination source-sink response relationship (GDCSRR), and spatial and temporal distribution and quantity (sink) of contamination. The object of most previous GDCSI studies has been a simple hypothetical example in which the contamination source was always generalized as a point. For a complex contamination source that cannot be generalized as a point, identifying its shape depicts the source in actual practical terms and ensures the accuracy of GDCSI. In this case study of a practical dye chemical factory in Hebei Province, China, firstly shape of DNAPL contamination source was identified. Then, GDCSRR was determined based on GDCSI result. Finally, sink of contamination based on GDCSRR was determined. Compared with a single study of GDCSI, this complete GDCSA research system provides a reference for identifying the polluter and also provides a more precise basis for contamination remediation scheme design and contamination risk assessment in practical cases. In this paper, we applied parallel heuristic search iterative process (PHSIP) based on simulation-random statistics method to solve GDCSI. However, the repetitive invocation of numerical simulation model has high computational cost during PHSIP. An effective method is to construct surrogate to emulate the simulation model at low computational cost. However, there is a complex nonlinear mapping relationship between input and output for multiphase flow simulation model with large number of variables and high dimension. The accuracy of a surrogate using shallow learning methods needs to be improved. Therefore, we have introduced deep-belief neural network (DBNN) surrogate to emulate the simulation model. A combination of hypothetical and practical cases was adopted in this study. Test of the proposed approaches for the hypothetical case revealed that the DBNN surrogate approximated the multiphase flow simulation model more closely than shallow learning surrogates, and that the PHSIP obtained accurate identification results. These tested approaches and the GDCSA research system were finally applied to the practical case.

Study on source identification and source-sink relationship of LNAPLs pollution in groundwater by the adaptive cyclic improved iterative process and Monte Carlo stochastic simulation

Simultaneous identification of groundwater pollution source spatial-temporal characteristics and hydraulic parameters based on deep regularization neural network-hybrid heuristic algorithm

Simulation of Water Quality in a River Network with Time-Varying Lateral Inflows and Pollutants

A combined search method based on a deep learning combined surrogate model for groundwater DNAPL contamination source identification

Simultaneous identification of groundwater pollution source and important hydrogeological parameters considering the noise uncertainty of observational data

Performance Evaluation of Surrogate Models for Simulating Multiphase NAPL Transport in Heterogeneous Aquifers

Cyclic Feedback Updating Approach and Uncertainty Analysis for the Source Identification of DNAPL-Contaminated Aquifers

Identification of Groundwater Pollution Sources by a SCE-UA Algorithm-Based Simulation/Optimization Model

Groundwater DNAPL contamination source-sink analysis research system based on the simulation-random statistical method for a practical case

Identification of light nonaqueous phase liquid groundwater contamination source based on empirical mode decomposition and deep learning

Characterizing Multi-Source Heavy Metal Contaminated Sites at the Hun River Basin: an Integrated Deep Learning and Data Assimilation Approach

Groundwater LNAPL Contamination Source Identification Based on Stacking Ensemble Surrogate Model

Surrogate Model-Based Simulation-Optimization Approach for Groundwater Source Identification Problems

Groundwater contamination source identification based on Rat Swarm Optimizer algorithm with a back-propagation neural network surrogate model

Identification of Groundwater Contamination Sources and Hydraulic Parameters Based on Bayesian Regularization Deep Neural Network.

Groundwater Contamination Source Recognition Based on a Two-Stage Inversion Framework with a Deep Learning Surrogate

Field Application at a DNAPL-contaminated Site in Nanjing and Discussion of a Source Search Algorithm Based on Stochastic Modeling and Kalman Filter

A Comparison of Inversion Methods for Surrogate‐Based Groundwater Contamination Source Identification With Varying Degrees of Model Complexity

Groundwater Contamination Source-Sink Analysis Based on Random Statistical Method for a Practical Case

An Effective Kalman Filter-Based Method for Groundwater Pollution Source Identification and Plume Morphology Characterization

Groundwater Contamination Sources Identification Based on the Long-Short Term Memory Network