Dual gradient echo in-phase and out of phase sequences in assessment of hepatic iron overload in patients with beta-thalassemia, would be better?

Ahmed Ali Mohamed Aboughonaim,Ashraf Naguib Ettaby,Khaled Ibrahim El-Noueum,Hoda Hassab,Doaa M. Emara
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110412
IF: 4.531
2022-09-01
European Journal of Radiology
Abstract:PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the dual gradient-echo (GRE) in- and out-of-phase sequences as a quantitative tool for hepatic iron overload in comparison with MRI R2* relaxometry in paediatric patients with beta-thalassemia.MethodSixty-three patients with beta-thalassemia major (transfusion-dependent) or beta-thalassemia intermedia (transfusion- and non-transfusion-dependent) were referred from the paediatric department (haematology unit) to the radiology department at a university hospital. The paediatrician conducted a clinical examination for the studied group, assessed their laboratory data, conducted R2* relaxometry and dual gradient echo sequences to calculate R2* and relative signal intensity index at the axial mid-section of the liver, and studied their correlation. A 1.5 Tesla MR scanner was used (Achieva; Philips Medical Systems, the Netherlands). Data were fed to the computer and analysed using the IBM SPSS software package version 20.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of distribution. The significance of the results was determined at the 5% level. The Chi-square, Fisher’s exact correction, Pearson coefficient, and Bland–Altman tests were used.ResultsDual gradient-echo in- and out-of-phase sequences using visual assessment accurately assessed 93.65% of our patient group with hepatic iron overload. A significant correlation was found between the relative signal intensity index and hepatic MRI R2* relaxometry (p < 0.001, r = 0.861).ConclusionsDual gradient-echo in and out-of-phase sequences are good imaging tools for hepatic iron detection and quantification. These sequences showed good correlation with R2* relaxometry (r = 0.861, p < 0.001).
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?