Abstract:Eulerian–Eulerian and Eulerian-Lagrangian numerical approaches are both widely used to investigate hydrodynamic behavior in dense gas-solid fluidized bed reactors, yet there has been a lack of comparative investigations involving the two. Therefore, the present work compares the numerical performance of a two-fluid model (TFM) and a dense discrete phase model (DDPM) in describing the hydrodynamic behavior of a pilot-scale bubbling bed reactor. The effects of several different parameters – drag force, grid size, fluid time-step, time-averaging interval, particle-wall specularity coefficient, particle-particle restitution coefficient, particle-wall reflection coefficient, and numbers of parcels (the latter two parameters only for the DDPM) – are investigated and compared for the two approaches using two-dimensional (2D) simulations. The numerical results for both models indicate that sub-grid drag correction based on the energy minimization and multiscale (EMMS) theory is the most essential modeling parameter to account for the multiscale structures (i.e., bubbles and void spaces) and to resolve the axial and radial solid distributions. Both the TFM and DDPM, coupled with the EMMS/bubbling drag, predict similar hydrodynamics behavior; however, the better accuracy in terms of axial and radial solids concentration profiles is achieved from the TFM approach. Further, our grid size analysis results indicate that the DDPM generates a better grid-independent solution than the TFM. This important advantage of the DDPM over TFM makes it a suitable candidate for large-scale industrial applications by employing it on much coarser grids. Meanwhile, the results from the time-step, time-averaging interval, specularity coefficient, restitution coefficient, reflection coefficient, and numbers of parcels represent a minor effect on the overall hydrodynamics behavior of the pilot-scale bubbling bed reactor.

Comparison of flow dynamics and reactor performance in gas-solids circulating turbulent fluidized bed with other fluidized beds across regimes

Solid Concentration and Velocity Distributions in an Annulus Turbulent Fluidized Bed

Multi-scale Characteristics and Gas-Solid Interaction among Multiple Beds in a Dual Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactor System

CFD Simulation and Hydrodynamics Characterization of Solids Oscillation Behavior in a Circulating Fluidized Bed with Sweeping Bend Return

Experimental research on solids oscillation circulation behavior in circulating fluidized bed

Dynamic Characteristics of Solids Circulation Establishment in Laboratory and Industrial Circulating Fluidized Beds with Sweeping Bend Return

Experimental Research on the Gas-Solid Flow Characteristics in Large-Scale Dual Fluidized Bed Reactor

Experimental study on bubble behavior in gas–liquid–solid three-phase circulating fluidized beds

Investigation of Unstable Solids Circulation Behavior in A Circulating Fluidized Bed with Sweeping Bend Return Using Pressure Frequency Analysis

Control of Pressure Balance and Solids Circulation Characteristics in DCFB Reactors

A comparative study on hydrodynamics of circulating fluidized bed riser and downer

Comparative Study of Two Fluid Model and Dense Discrete Phase Model for Simulations of Gas–solid Hydrodynamics in Circulating Fluidized Beds

Experiments on Particles Flow in a Dual Circulating Fluidized Bed with Symmetrical Structure

Dual-dense gas-solid circulating fluidized bed reactor

Comparison of the flow structures and regime transitions between a cylindrical fluidized bed and a square fluidized bed

Comparative Study on Flow Characteristic of Supercritical Water Fluidized Bed and Traditional Fluidized Bed

Particle-Fluid Heat Transfer In A Circulating Fluidized Bed

Experimental Study of High-Density Gas–solids Flow in a New Coupled Circulating Fluidized Bed

Effects of Operating Parameters on Solids Flux in a High-Density/-Flux Circulating Fluidized Bed Riser Reactor

Comparison of Two-Fluid and Discrete Particle Modeling of Gas-Particle Flows in Micro Fluidized Beds

Comparative CFD Modeling of a Bubbling Bed Using a Eulerian–Eulerian Two-Fluid Model (TFM) and a Eulerian-Lagrangian Dense Discrete Phase Model (DDPM)