Acidification of 24-hour urine in urolithiasis risk testing: An obsolete relic?

Janne Cadamuro,Cosima Decho,Glynis Frans,Simon Auer,Alexander von Meyer,Kathrin M. Kniewallner,Martin Drerup,Elmar Heinrich,Martin H. Keppel,Cornelia Mrazek,Thomas K. Felder,Hannes Oberkofler,Elisabeth Haschke-Becher,Ulrike Kipman,Tomas Salek,Pieter Vermeersch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2022.05.010
IF: 6.314
2022-07-01
Clinica Chimica Acta
Abstract:BackgroundRecommendations on the optimal preservation of 24 h urine for the metabolic work-up in urolithiasis patients are very heterogeneous. In case two such tests with different storage condition recommendations are being analysed, multiple collections would be needed, challenging especially elderly and very young patients. We therefore aimed to evaluate the stability of urine constituents under different storage conditions.Material and methodsWe collected urine samples from ten healthy volunteers and prepared aliquots to be stored either at room temperature or 4 °C. Some aliquots were preserved using hydrochloric acid prior to storage, some thereafter, some using the BD Urine preservation tube and some were not preserved at all. Storage duration was 0, 24, 48 or 72 h. In all samples calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, creatinine, oxalate, citrate and uric acid were measured and compared to the according reference sample.ResultsWe could not find any significant deviation for any of the analytes and preanalytical treatment conditions compared to the associated reference sample.ConclusionPreservation of 24 h urine for the metabolic evaluation in stone formers might not be necessary for sample storage up to 72 h.
medical laboratory technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?