Effect of metal artifact reduction level on the assessment of dental implant positioning by cone-beam computed tomography

Camila Porto Capel,Raphael Jurca Gonçalves da Motta,Ruben Pauwels,Hugo Gaêta-Araujo,Christiano Oliveira-Santos,Camila Tirapelli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae008
2024-03-11
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
Abstract:Abstract Objectives This study evaluated the effect of metal artifact reduction (MAR) level and tube current on the assessment of dental implant positioning relative to the mandibular canal (MC) through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods Titanium dental implants were placed in dried mandibles at 0.5 mm superior to the MC (Group 1/n = 8), 0.5 mm inside the MC with perforation of the cortex (Group 2/n = 10). CBCT scans were obtained with different levels of MAR (off, medium and high) and two tube currents (4 mA and 8 mA). Four examiners analyzed the images and scored the contact between the implant and the MC using a 5-point scale. Sensitivity, specificity, area under receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and frequency of scores were calculated. Data were compared with ANOVA two-way and Tukey's test and scores with Chi-Square test. Results Specificity and area under ROC curve decreased significantly when MAR level was high compared with MAR-medium and MAR-off. The frequency of score 3 (inconclusive) was the highest, and scores 1 and 5 (definitely no contact and definitely contact, respectively) were the lowest with MAR-high, regardless of the tube current. When MAR was off, there were higher frequencies of scores 1 and 5. Conclusion The level of MAR influences the assessment of the relationship between the dental implant and the MC. MAR-high led to lower diagnostic accuracy compared with MAR-medium and off. Advances in knowledge This paper shows that high level of MAR can interfere in the diagnostic of dental implant positioning relative to the mandibular canal, decreasing its accuracy.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the influence of metal artifact reduction (MAR) levels and tube current on diagnostic accuracy when evaluating the position of dental implants relative to the mandibular canal (MC) in cone - beam computed tomography (CBCT). Specifically, the study aims to explore the effects of different levels of MAR algorithms and two different tube currents (4 mA and 8 mA) on the evaluation of the contact between dental implants and the mandibular canal on the CBCT device Eagle 3D. The research hypothesis is that different MAR levels and tube currents will not affect the evaluation of the relationship between dental implants and the mandibular canal. ### Research Background Cone - beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become a standard examination method in the field of dental implantology and is usually recommended for the diagnosis and planning of dental implants. However, the use of CBCT after surgery may encounter the problem of metal artifacts, which can interfere with the accurate assessment of implant position, especially when the implant is close to or in contact with the mandibular canal. ### Research Objectives - **Evaluate different levels of MAR algorithms**: Study the influence of different levels of MAR (off, medium, high) on the evaluation of the contact between implants and the mandibular canal. - **Evaluate different tube currents**: Study the influence of two tube currents, 4 mA and 8 mA, on the evaluation results. ### Methods - **Sample preparation**: Use 10 dry human mandibles, and install titanium implants through 3D - printed surgical guides, divided into two groups: Group G1 (the implant is located 0.5 mm above the mandibular canal), Group G2 (the implant penetrates 0.5 mm into the mandibular canal). - **CBCT image acquisition**: Use the Eagle 3D CBCT device to acquire CBCT images under different MAR levels and tube current conditions. - **Image selection and capture**: Capture 4 images (3 coronal planes and 1 sagittal plane) from each CBCT examination. - **Image evaluation**: Four professionals (2 general dentists and 2 oral radiologists) evaluate the images according to a 5 - point scoring standard to determine whether the implant is in contact with the mandibular canal. - **Statistical analysis**: Use SPSS software for statistical analysis, calculate the area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, and perform analysis of variance and chi - square test. ### Results - **AUC**: The AUC at the high MAR level is significantly lower than that at the medium and off MAR levels. - **Accuracy**: The accuracy at the high MAR level is lower. - **Specificity**: The specificity at the high MAR level is significantly reduced. - **Score distribution**: At the high MAR level, the frequency of score 3 (uncertain) is the highest, while the frequencies of scores 1 and 5 (clearly no contact and clearly in contact) are the lowest. ### Conclusions - **High MAR level**: The high MAR level will reduce diagnostic accuracy and lead to more uncertain scores. - **Tube current**: The higher tube current (8 mA) does not bring diagnostic advantages. - **Recommendations**: When evaluating the contact between implants and the mandibular canal, the high MAR level is not recommended, and it is recommended to use a lower tube current (4 mA). ### Significance This study reveals the negative impact of the high MAR level in some specific diagnostic tasks, providing an important reference for clinicians when using CBCT.