Evaluation of dynamic soil stress distribution in GRS bridge abutments subjected to cyclic loading

Yafei Jia,Chuan-Bao Xu,Jun Zhang,Jun-jie Zheng,Yewei Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.05.003
IF: 5.839
2024-05-19
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Abstract:Traffic-induced cyclic loading generates repetitive stresses and cumulative deformations on the GRS abutments, which affect the serviceability of GRS abutments. To evaluate the stress distribution of GRS abutments under cyclic traffic loading, this paper presents reduced-scale GRS abutment models constructed with sand backfill and geogrid reinforcements. The GRS abutment models were subjected to staged cyclic loading with different cyclic loading amplitudes to investigate the influences of cyclic loading amplitude, bridge superstructure load, and reinforcement vertical spacing on the dynamic soil stress distributions. The results indicate that the increase in residual stresses due to stress redistribution induced by cyclic loading is most pronounced at the top of the abutment, while there is little stress redistribution down to the foundation level. Increasing the static load of bridge superstructure or the amplitude of cyclic loading results in an increase in the incremental dynamic vertical soil stresses. Reinforcement vertical spacing does not significantly impact the incremental dynamic vertical soil stresses under cyclic loading, while the cyclic load has the most significant influence. Closer reinforcement vertical spacing could provide stronger lateral confinement, resulting in larger dynamic lateral soil stresses behind wall facing.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,engineering, geological
What problem does this paper attempt to address?