Clinical Effectiveness of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor–Based Antiretroviral Regimens Among Adults With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Collaboration of Cohort Studies in the United States and Canada

Haidong Lu,Stephen R Cole,Daniel Westreich,Michael G Hudgens,Adaora A Adimora,Keri N Althoff,Michael J Silverberg,Kate Buchacz,Jun Li,Jessie K Edwards,Peter F Rebeiro,Viviane D Lima,Vincent C Marconi,Timothy R Sterling,Michael A Horberg,M John Gill,Mari M Kitahata,Joseph J Eron,Richard D Moore
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1037
IF: 20.999
2020-08-11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Abstract Background Integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI)–based regimens are now recommended as first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) for adults with human immunodeficiency virus, but evidence on long-term clinical effectiveness of InSTI-based regimens remains limited. We examined whether InSTI-based regimens improved longer-term clinical outcomes. Methods We included participants from clinical cohorts in the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design who initiated their first ART regimen, containing either InSTI (ie, raltegravir, dolutegravir, and elvitegravir-cobicistat) or efavirenz (EFV) as an active comparator, between 2009 and 2016. We estimated observational analogs of 6-year intention-to-treat and per-protocol risks, risk differences (RDs), and hazard ratios (HRs) for the composite outcome of AIDS, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, end-stage renal disease, end-stage liver disease, or death. Results Of 15 993 participants, 5824 (36%) initiated an InSTI-based and 10 169 (64%) initiated an EFV-based regimen. During the 6-year follow-up, 440 in the InSTI group and 1097 in the EFV group incurred the composite outcome. The estimated 6-year intention-to-treat risks were 14.6% and 14.3% for the InSTI and EFV groups, respectively, corresponding to a RD of 0.3% (95% confidence interval, −2.7% to 3.3%) and a HR of 1.08 (.97–1.19); the estimated 6-year per-protocol risks were 12.2% for the InSTI group and 11.9% for the EFV group, corresponding to a RD of 0.3% (−3.0% to 3.7%) and a HR of 1.09 (.96–1.25). Conclusions InSTI- and EFV-based initial ART regimens had similar 6-year composite clinical outcomes. The risk of adverse clinical outcomes remains substantial even when initiating modern ART.
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?