Abstract:In recent years, several studies have consistently reported robust form–orthographic priming effects when primes and targets shared the identity of individual letters but in a different order (e.g., gadren priming garden). Masked priming with transposed letters was reported in several Indo-European languages such as English (e. The finding that robust form–orthographic priming can be obtained even with changes in letter order has revolutionized the mod-eling of visual word recognition. It presented immense difficulties for slot-based coding computational models, which encode letter position in absolute terms—for example , the interactive activation (IA) model by McClel-land and Rumelhart (1981) or the dual-route cascaded (DRC) model by Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon, and Ziegler (2001). Consequently, a new generation of computational models that focus on context-sensitive coding of relative letter position has emerged (e. for a discussion). Perhaps the most dramatic demonstration of how reading is resilient to letter transposition is the following paragraph that has been circulating via the Internet, especially in the reading research community: Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. We should note upfront that the original text does not refer to any true research project that was ever conducted at the University of Cambridge. We cannot know precisely why the author who drafted the above paragraph chose the name " Cambridge University effect " for this phenomenon that effectively demonstrates the impact of jumbled letters, or lack of such impact, and the name has stuck. Since its first appearance in 2003, the Cambridge Univesity effect has become somewhat of an urban legend. Apparently the original demonstration of the effect of letter randomization on skilled reading (or rather lack of it) belongs to Rawlinson, 1976 (and see Rawlinson, 1999, for a reference to it). In an unpublished dissertation, he showed that letter randomization in the middle of the word had little effect on the ability of skilled readers to understand the printed text (see Davis, 2003, for a web page devoted to the effect). A recent study monitoring eye movements showed that, indeed, some transpositions are easy to read, …

Visual Word Expertise: A Study of Inversion and the Word-Length Effect, with Perceptual Transforms

The Cognitive Lag Effect in Chinese Sentences Reading

The word-length effect in reading: A review

Modulation of oculomotor control during reading of mirrored and inverted texts

Opposite size illusions for inverted faces and letters

The Effect of Letter Transposition on Reading Is Attracting Significant Attention in Visual Word Recognition Research. the Impact of Letter Transposition on Reading English and Hebrew

Reading vertically and horizontally mirrored text: An eye movement investigation

Individual differences and the transposed letter effect during reading

Lateralized reading in the healthy brain: A behavioral and computational study on the nature of the visual field effect

Aging and the optimal viewing position effect in visual word recognition: Evidence from English.

Reading about a RELO-VUTION

Visual word learning in skilled readers of English

Tracking the brain signature of (mis)spelled logotypes via letter transpositions and replacements

Language Dominance Modulates Transposed-Letter N400 Priming Effects in Bilinguals

A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese

Morpheme Transposition of Two-Character Chinese Words in Vertical Visual Fields

Effects of word length on eye movement control: The evidence from Arabic

The Advantage of Word-Based Processing in Chinese Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements.

The Left Ventral Occipito-Temporal Response to Words Depends on Language Lateralization but Not on Visual Familiarity.

Learning to read transforms phonological into phonographic representations: Evidence from a Mismatch Negativity study

Written-Word Concreteness Effects in Non-attend Conditions: Evidence From Mismatch Responses and Cortical Oscillations