Relevance about the use of dexametasone in a patient with chronic suddural hematoma: a literature review

Louisy Carvalho Araújo,Marina Crispim Sarmento,Nicole Sarmento Queiroga,Lucas Vinicius Rafael Figueiredo,Michelle Salles Barros de Aguiar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5327/1516-3180.523
2021-01-01
Abstract:Introduction: The use of corticosteroids, especially dexamethasone, for the treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH), is a secular conduct protocol. However, recent studies contradict this recommendation in some points. Objectives: To score the use of dexamethasone in patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma. Methodology: Literature review, based on PubMed database using the descriptors “Desamethasone”, “Chronic Subdural Hematoma” and “Treatment”, using a time filter from the years 2020-2021. Results: In a study with 443 neurosurgeons, 26.2% of respondents estimate that corticosteroids are highly effective in CSDH, with 46.2% using dexamethasone as monotherapy in conservative treatment. According to a randomized study conducted by The New England Journal, 375 people diagnosed with CSDH were treated with dexamethasone while 373 received the placebo, where 94% had undergone surgical treatment previously. At the end of the study, only 680 candidate patients continued to be analyzed, of which a favorable outcome was seen in 286 of 341 (83.9%) in the dexamethasone group and in 306 of 339 patients (90.30) in the placebo group, where there is a difference of 6.4 percentage points in favor of the placebo. In addition, in the same study, more adverse effects occurred in the dexamethasone group, however, 1.7% of the patients in this group needed surgery for hematoma recurrence compared to 7.1% in the group that used the placebo. Conclusion: It is possible to say that treatment with dexamethasone caused more adverse effects and resulted in less favorable outcomes, however, the recurrence for the number of surgeries was lower.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?