Abstract:OTJR: Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, Ahead of Print. Adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) require high levels of assistance to participate in occupations. Otherwise, they experience low occupational engagement. This study aimed to explore how parents describe participation in occupations for their adult children with PIMD. Semi-structured interviews (n = 9) were conducted to understand how parents described their adult children's participation in occupations. Data were analyzed using the theory of co-occupation to identify themes and triangulate findings with the literature. Parents described participation as co-occupation in "essential" versus "non-essential" occupations. Participation in essential co-occupations emphasized shared physicality, while non-essential co-occupations focused on joint meaning (shared intentionality) and emotional responses (shared emotionality). Findings illustrate a way to conceptualize participation in essential versus non-essential co-occupations for adults with PIMD, highlight the importance of recognizing and illuminating subjective experiences of adults with PIMD, and provide a foundation for occupational therapists to increase occupational engagement within this population.Plain Language SummaryParents Describe How Their Children With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities Participate in Everyday Activities With Other PeopleWhy was this study done? This study was done to learn about how people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) participate in everyday activities. We know that these people need help and do not participate in activities as much as others. We must understand more to increase their opportunities for meaningful activities. What did the researchers do? The researcher talked to 10 parents about their 9 adult children with PIMD. The researcher asked questions about how the adult children participated in daily activities. The research team compared what the parents said and found similar themes. What did the researchers find? Parents said that their children with disabilities participated in activities as co-occupation, which means they needed someone else to do the activities with them. The parents described participation differently if the activity was essential or non-essential. Essential activities are things we need to do to stay alive and healthy. Non-essential activities are those that increase social or mental well-being. If the activity was essential, such as getting dressed, the parents mostly talked about the physical interactions. If the activity was non-essential, such as playing, the parents talked mostly about emotions and reasons for doing the activity. What do the findings mean? People with PIMD participate in activities as co-occupation. The type of help they need depends on the activity. It is also important to recognize all forms of expression when observing participation and figuring out what is meaningful to someone with physical disabilities. Occupational therapists can use this information to increase participation in meaningful activity for adults with PIMD and their caregivers. Future research should include observations and explore sibling's perspectives across different races and cultures.

Honoring Activity Preferences in Individualized Plan Development: A Descriptive Analysis

Outcomes of Person-Centered Planning in Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services

Adolescents with intellectual disability (ID) and their perceptions of activity and sports

The Development and Evaluation of a Participant Led Physical Activity Intervention for People with Disabilities Who Intend to Become More Active

Enhancing Parent Participation in the Individualized Family Service Plan

Participation as Co-Occupation Between Parents and Adult Children With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities

Participant-reported priorities and preferences for developing a home-based physical activity telemonitoring program for persons with tetraplegia: a qualitative analysis

"It's what would work for her": An analysis of adaptations to the Individualized Positive Psychosocial Interaction program in US nursing homes

An Adapted Physical Activity Program for Adolescents with an Intellectual Disability: An International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Perspective

To Identify and Compare ActivPAL Objectively Measured Activity Levels With Self‐Reported Activity From the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Older Adults With Intellectual Disability

An Investigation of the Wishes, Needs, Opportunities and Challenges of Accessing Meaningful Activities for People Living with Mild to Moderate Dementia

An Individual vs Parent Supported Physical Activity Intervention in Adolescents with Intellectual Disabilities

Identifying the top 10 priorities of adolescents with a physical disability regarding participation in physical activity: A Delphi study

An exploration into self-reported inactivity behaviours of adults with an intellectual disability using physical activity questionnaires

Student Competition (Clinical/Best Practice Implementation) ID 1984705

Factors influencing choice and ability to age in place: A qualitative study with patients, caregivers, and clinicians

Trust, respect, and training: Principles of care for service professionals supporting adults with intellectual disabilities in community residential programs

Independence through community access and navigation: A supported leisure intervention for individuals with negative symptoms.

Quantifying Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review of Assessment Methodologies

Understanding the experiences of older adult participants and individuals involved in the delivery of a physical activity programme based on participatory approaches: A qualitative analysis

Reflections on Participation at Home, As Self-Reported by Young People with Cerebral Palsy