Abstract:Social media provides the means by which extremist social movements, such as white supremacy and anti-LGBTQ, thrive online. Yet, we know little about the roles played by the participants of such movements. In this paper, we investigate these participants to characterize their roles, their role dynamics, and their influence in spreading online extremism. Our participants-online extremist accounts-are 4,876 public Facebook pages or groups that have shared information from the websites of 289 Southern Poverty LawCenter (SPLC) designated extremist groups. Guided by theories of participatory activism, we map the information sharing features of these extremists accounts. By clustering the quantitative features followed by qualitative expert validation, we identify five roles surrounding extremist activism-educators, solicitors, flamers, motivators, sympathizers. For example, solicitors use links from extremist websites to attract donations and participation in extremist issues, whereas flamers share inflammatory extremist content inciting anger. We further investigate role dynamics such as, how stable these roles are over time and how likely will extremist accounts transition from one role into another. We find that roles core to the movement-educators and solicitors-are more stable, while flamers and motivators can transition to sympathizers with high probability. Finally, using a Hawkes process model, we test which roles are more influential in spreading various types of information. We find that educators and solicitors exert the most influence in triggering extremist link posts, whereas flamers are influential in triggering the spread of information from fake news sources. Our results help in situating various roles on the trajectory of deeper engagement into the extremist movements and understanding the potential effect of various counter-extremism interventions. Our findings have implications for understanding how online extremist movements flourish through participatory activism and how they gain a spectrum of allies for mobilizing extremism online.

Anti-Muslim prejudice in the virtual space: A case study of blog network structure and message features of the ‘Ground Zero mosque controversy’

Exploring Online Polarization Phenomenon:Content Analysis of Four Major Chinese BBS Forums

The dynamics of negative stereotypes as revealed by tweeting behavior in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack

The Effect of Extremist Violence on Hateful Speech Online

Different Strokes: American Muslim Scholars Engage Media and Politics in the Woke Era

The Role of Networked Narratives in Amplifying or Mitigating Intergroup Prejudice: A YouTube Case Study

Multi-Platform Framing Analysis: A Case Study of Kristiansand Quran Burning

Trends and Topics: Characterizing Echo Chambers' Topological Stability and In-group Attitudes

Educators, Solicitors, Flamers, Motivators, Sympathizers: Characterizing Roles in Online Extremist Movements

Dynamics of Ideological Biases of Social Media Users

The Narrative Foundations of Radical and Deradicalizing Online Discursive Spaces: A Comparison of the Cases of Generation Islam and Jamal al-Khatib in Germany

A Novel Public Opinion Polarization Model Based on BA Network

Unpacking the black box: An investigation of online crisis communication patterns among stakeholders in the NIMBY conflict

Ideological asymmetries in online hostility, intimidation, obscenity, and prejudice

Are we always in strife? A longitudinal study of the echo chamber effect in the Australian Twittersphere

X-posing Free Speech: Examining the Impact of Moderation Relaxation on Online Social Networks

Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms

Poster Abstract: Homophily and Controversy: on the Role of Public Opinion in Online Viral Diffusion

The impact of social media on polarization in the society

Examining the Online Expression of Ideology among Far-Right Extremist Forum Users