Intraepidermal nerve fiber analysis using immunofluorescence with and without confocal microscopy

Vincenzo Provitera,Maria Nolano,Annamaria Stancanelli,Giuseppe Caporaso,Dino F. Vitale,Lucio Santoro
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.24338
2015-02-11
Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) linear density is a reliable tool to detect small-fiber neuropathies. In immunofluorescence, the IENF count is performed typically by computer-assisted nerve tracing on confocal images. Alternatively, the count can be performed directly through the oculars of a standard epifluorescence microscope. We specifically compared measures obtained using the 2 methods.METHODS: We compared measures of IENF density in the same 50 skin samples using computer-assisted image analysis and direct count.RESULTS: There was excellent agreement between the 2 methods. Linear regression showed a slope between paired measures virtually equal to 1 (β = 0.99). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference (offset) between the measures of 0.46 ± 0.91 fibers/mm.CONCLUSIONS: Direct observation with epifluorescence microscopy proved as reliable as the more time-consuming 3-dimensional computer-assisted analysis of confocal digital images for determining IENF density.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?