Hypnotizability, Personality Style, and Attachment: An Exploratory Study, Part 2—Results With Particular Focus on Sex

Burkhard Peter,Tanja Prade,Sarah E. Vogel,John C. Mohl,Emilia Geiger,Christoph Piesbergen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2014.910746

2014-07-10

American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis

Abstract:The relationship between hypnotizability, personality style, and attachment was examined according to sex in 99 student participants. No specific differences for personality and hypnotizability were found in the highly hypnotizable participants according to sex. Similarly, no differences were found between high, medium, and low hypnotizable females, though differences were found among males. For males, the best predictor of hypnotizability was the unselfish/self-sacrificing personality style, which explained 40% of variance. This was in contrast to low hypnotizable males, who were less spontaneous/borderline, self-critical/avoidant, unselfish/self-sacrificing, but more assertive/antisocial. In comparison with females, low hypnotizable males were less intuitive/schizotypal and less loyal/dependent. Within the whole sample and among securely attached high hypnotizables, two peaks were observed for charming/histrionic and optimistic/rhapsodic styles, which suggests a "prone to hypnosis" personality style. Such people are optimistic and charming, and tend to be securely attached. This may suggest a high self-selection bias in hypnosis experiments and potentially creates confounds for the majority of such studies.

psychology, clinical