Abstract:Active learning in college classes and participation in the workforce frequently hinge on small group work. However, group dynamics vary, ranging from equitable collaboration to dysfunctional groups dominated by one individual. To explore how group dynamics impact student learning, we asked students in a large-enrollment university biology class to self-report their experience during in-class group work. Specifically, we asked students whether there was a friend in their group, whether they were comfortable in their group, and whether someone dominated their group. Surveys were administered after students participated in two different types of intentionally constructed group activities: 1) a loosely-structured activity wherein students worked together for an entire class period (termed the 'single-group' activity), or 2) a highly-structured 'jigsaw' activity wherein students first independently mastered different subtopics, then formed new groups to peer-teach their respective subtopics. We measured content mastery by the change in score on identical pre-/post-tests. We then investigated whether activity type or student demographics predicted the likelihood of reporting working with a dominator, being comfortable in their group, or working with a friend. We found that students who more strongly agreed that they worked with a dominator were 17.8% less likely to answer an additional question correct on the 8-question post-test. Similarly, when students were comfortable in their group, content mastery increased by 27.5%. Working with a friend was the single biggest predictor of student comfort, although working with a friend did not impact performance. Finally, we found that students were 67% less likely to agree that someone dominated their group during the jigsaw activities than during the single group activities. We conclude that group activities that rely on positive interdependence, and include turn-taking and have explicit prompts for students to explain their reasoning, such as our jigsaw, can help reduce the negative impact of inequitable groups.

The Affordances of Using Visibly Random Groups in a Mathematics Classroom

Mathematics Learning in Groups: Analyzing Equity in Two Cooperative Activity Structures

When Group Work Doesn’t Work: Insights from Students

Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: impact on students’ mathematics learning

Alternative tools for motivating young primary school students when learning Maths

Share It, Don’t Split It: Can Equitable Group Work Improve Student Outcomes?

Student perception of group dynamics predicts individual performance: Comfort and equity matter

Performance, Knowledge Acquisition and Satisfaction in Self-selected Groups: Evidence from a Classroom Field Experiment

Bounded confidence modeling predicts how group work affects student math anxiety

Teacher interventions in small group work in secondary mathematics and science lessons

Active learning strategies for an effective mathematics teaching and learning

Mathematical strategies and emergence of socially mediated metacognition within a multi-touch Dynamic Geometry Environment

Professional development of mathematics teachers toward the facilitation of small-group collaboration

Mathematical discussion in classrooms as a technologically-supported activity fostering participation and inclusion

Potential relationship of epistemic games to group dynamics and learning orientations towards physics problem solving

Taking Up Opportunities to Learn: Constructing Dispositions in Mathematics Classrooms

Everyday Knowledge and Mathematical Modeling of School Word Problems

Mathematical Problem-Solving Through Cooperative Learning—The Importance of Peer Acceptance and Friendships

The impact of grouping in mathematics: Views from Kurdistan-Iraqi high school teachers

Group Cooperative Learning Strategies in Mathematics Class

Teaching Mathematics with a New Curriculum: Changes to Classroom Organization and Interactions