Combination of ozonation with GAC, AIX and biochar post-treatment for removal of pharmaceuticals and transformation products from municipal WWTP effluent
Malhun Fakioglu,Oksana Golovko,Christian Baresel,Lutz Ahrens,Izzet Ozturk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ew00702f
2024-10-16
Environmental Science Water Research & Technology
Abstract:Pharmaceuticals have been detected in water and wastewater, resulting in increasing research attention towards the elimination of these substances from aqueous environments. Due to the limitations of conventional processes in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to fully eliminate these compounds, more research is needed on complementary advanced treatment technologies. This study aims to examine the removal efficiency for 24 selected pharmaceuticals and the fate of their 7 main metabolites including several oxidation transformation products by various technique combinations applied on the effluent from a full-scale WWTP. Investigated treatment options include ozonation (O 3 ) combined with either granular activated carbon (GAC), two different types of biochar, and anion exchange (AIX) in a continuously operated laboratory-scale system. The average removal of analyzed pharmaceuticals ranged between 8.8–97% with an O 3 dose of 0.28 g O 3 /g DOC (dissolved organic carbon), whereas it ranged from 86–99% for higher O 3 dosages (0.96 and 2.17 g O 3 /g DOC). Overall, the investigated metabolites of pharmaceuticals exhibited lower removal efficiency (between −33 and 99%) with ozone compared to the parent compounds at all O 3 -dosages. Concentrations of oxidation transformation products such as citalopram N -oxide were increased after ozone treatment, whereas it was decreased after the columns at different rates. The bromate concentrations during all three O 3 -dosages (0.28, 0.96 and 2.17 g O 3 /g DOC) were below 5 μg L −1 . GAC was the best performing sorbent among all materials, where even after two weeks of continuous operation, nearly all compounds were removed below quantification levels. Although biochar 1 showed better performance (30–89%, mean = 68%) than biochar 2 (8.5–82%, mean = 38%), both sorption materials showed reduced sorption capacity over the time period of two weeks for most of the target compounds. On the other hand, AIX had lower removal rates ranging between 2–55% (mean = 20%). Regarding the combination of O 3 with the individual sorbent materials, GAC was the most successful combination with O 3 for the removal of pharmaceuticals (>99%) and oxidation transformation products (>60%). The combination of O 3 with biochar 1 was more successful (mean = 91%) than the combination with biochar 2 (mean = 79%), where the combination of O 3 with AIX showed the lowest removal rates (mean = 58%).
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental,water resources