Abstract:A vital heuristic used when making judgements on whether audio-visual signals arise from the same event, is the temporal coincidence of the respective signals. Previous research has highlighted a process, whereby the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates to account for differences in the physical temporal offsets of stimuli. The current paper investigated whether rapid recalibration also occurs in response to differences in central arrival latencies, driven by visual-intensity-dependent processing times. In a behavioural experiment, observers completed a temporal-order judgement (TOJ), simultaneity judgement (SJ) and simple reaction-time (RT) task and responded to audio-visual trials that were preceded by other audio-visual trials with either a bright or dim visual stimulus. It was found that the point of subjective simultaneity shifted, due to the visual intensity of the preceding stimulus, in the TOJ, but not SJ task, while the RT data revealed no effect of preceding intensity. Our data therefore provide some evidence that the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates based on stimulus intensity. A vital heuristic used when making judgements on whether audio-visual signals arise from the same event, is the temporal coincidence of the respective signals. Previous research has highlighted a process, whereby the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates to account for differences in the physical temporal offsets of stimuli. The current paper investigated whether rapid recalibration also occurs in response to differences in central arrival latencies, driven by visual-intensity-dependent processing times. In a behavioural experiment, observers completed a temporal-order judgement (TOJ), simultaneity judgement (SJ) and simple reaction-time (RT) task and responded to audio-visual trials that were preceded by other audio-visual trials with either a bright or dim visual stimulus. It was found that the point of subjective simultaneity shifted, due to the visual intensity of the preceding stimulus, in the TOJ, but not SJ task, while the RT data revealed no effect of preceding intensity. Our data therefore provide some evidence that the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates based on stimulus intensity. A vital heuristic used when making judgements on whether audio-visual signals arise from the same event, is the temporal coincidence of the respective signals. Previous research has highlighted a process, whereby the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates to account for differences in the physical temporal offsets of stimuli. The current paper investigated whether rapid recalibration also occurs in response to differences in central arrival latencies, driven by visual-intensity-dependent processing times. In a behavioural experiment, observers completed a temporal-order judgement (TOJ), simultaneity judgement (SJ) and simple reaction-time (RT) task and responded to audio-visual trials that were preceded by other audio-visual trials with either a bright or dim visual stimulus. It was found that the point of subjective simultaneity shifted, due to the visual intensity of the preceding stimulus, in the TOJ, but not SJ task, while the RT data revealed no effect of preceding intensity. Our data therefore provide some evidence that the perception of simultaneity rapidly recalibrates based on stimulus intensity.

Visual field differences in temporal synchrony processing for audio-visual stimuli

The influence of spatial frequency information on temporal synchrony perception on audiovisual stimuli

Asymmetrical Cross-Modal Influence on Neural Encoding of Auditory and Visual Features in Natural Scenes.

Audio-visual synchrony and spatial attention enhance processing of dynamic visual stimulation independently and in parallel: A frequency-tagging study

Perceived Audio-Visual Simultaneity Is Recalibrated by the Visual Intensity of the Preceding Trial

Role of audiovisual synchrony in driving head orienting responses

Costs and benefits of audiovisual interactions

Attentional modulations of audiovisual interactions in apparent motion: Temporal ventriloquism effects on perceived visual speed

The Speed and Temporal Frequency of Visual Apparent Motion Modulate Auditory Duration Perception

Attentional demands in the visual field modulate audiovisual interactions in the temporal domain

Audiovisual speech asynchrony asymmetrically modulates neural binding

The stimulus‐driven and representation‐driven cross‐modal attentional spreading are both modulated by audiovisual temporal synchrony

Temporal ventriloquism along the path of apparent motion: speed perception under different spatial grouping principles

The modulation of background color on perceiving audiovisual simultaneity

Audiovisual Temporal Perception in Aging: The Role of Multisensory Integration and Age-Related Sensory Loss

Audiovisual simultaneity windows reflect temporal sensory uncertainty

Neural Correlates of Temporal Complexity and Synchrony During Audiovisual Correspondence Detection

Differences in audiovisual temporal processing in autistic adults are specific to simultaneity judgments

Audiovisual Integration of Natural Auditory and Visual Stimuli in the Real-World Situation

What You See Depends on What You Hear: Temporal Averaging and Crossmodal Integration

Multisensory integration of speech signals: the relationship between space and time