A Study of the Developmental Mechanisms of Inter-Team Conflict Processes Within Multi-Team Systems - An Exploratory Analysis Based on a Collaborative R&D Context
Nan Niu,Haozhe Shi,Hongfei Lv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s449143
IF: 3.974
2024-03-12
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Nan Niu, Haozhe Shi, Hongfei Lv School of Management, Hebei University, Baoding, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Nan Niu, School of Management, Hebei University, Lianchi District, Baoding City, Hebei, Province, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: The analysis of the pivotal determinants that impact the progression of inter-team conflict processes in multi-team systems, as well as their underlying mechanisms, serves to explicate the developmental framework of said conflict processes. Methodology: This study adopts a vantage point centered on the evolution of inter-team conflict in multi-team systems, with a specific focus on the sequential progression including "conflict latency → conflict perception → conflict management → conflict outcome → conflict feedback. Results: By transmuting qualitative data into quantitative data through the discernment of inter-conceptual relationships' directionality and quantity, this study distills the key chain of relationships between categories. Employing the explanatory structure model, the developmental mechanism of inter-team conflict processes in multi-team systems is unveiled. Notable sources of conflict include team goal identification, team role multiplicity, inter-team relationships, and team competence. Factors that exert a significant influence on conflict management comprise inter-team conflict types, inter-team relationships, team competence, inter-team heterogeneity, team affiliation, and system goals. Reviewing the genuine motivations underlying conflict management behavior, as well as adopting a lengthier temporal perspective, emerges as a crucial consideration when analyzing the implications of conflict management on both the system and the team for evaluative purposes. Inter-team communication emerges as a pivotal influence on the efficacy of conflict management, which, in turn, is influenced by boundary managers, inter-team heterogeneity, and the inter-team interactive memory system. Conclusion: Through an in-depth analysis of the hierarchical interrelationships among factors that influence conflicts within teams, we have established a model for the conflict development process. This model is instrumental in comprehensively understanding the dynamics of conflict evolution within teams. It serves as a reference point for formulating more precise and effective conflict management strategies. Moreover, this model not only offers practical guidance for resolving conflicts within a multi-team framework but also enhances inter-team collaboration. Therefore, it contributes significantly to achieving the objectives of the multi-team system. Keywords: multi-team systems, conflict processes, developmental mechanisms, explanatory structural models In the contemporary complex and unpredictable operational environment, there is a critical need to improve organizational agility and efficiency. In response to this, the implementation of collaborative efforts across multiple teams has become increasingly common as a strategy to address these changing conditions and demands. Mathieu conceptualizes this approach as a Multi-team System (MTS) from a systemic perspective 1 . This view underlines the inherent systemic characteristics of an MTS. Considering the diversity in knowledge, skills, and roles among the various sub-teams within a multi-team system, inter-team conflicts are a frequent occurrence. These conflicts are especially prominent in cross-organizational multi-team systems, where differences in organizational cultures and values are more acute. Present studies on inter-team conflict within multi-team systems tend to either focus narrowly on analyzing segmented influences or limit themselves to merely describing the stages of inter-team conflict. Such approaches often overlook the comprehensive understanding of the dynamics involved. For instance, certain studies have focused on the impact of team commitment and profit distribution on inter-team conflicts. 2 Walter et al conducted research on the role of individual emotion regulation in transforming task conflicts and process conflicts into relationship conflicts. 3 They also made preliminary explorations into individual perceptions of task and process conflicts, including the probability of process conflicts evolving into team relationship conflicts. Paul et al noted the importance of sensitively perceiving and understanding conflicts within multi-team scenarios, though they did not extensively delve into this topic. 4 The academic community generally agrees on the crucial importance of managing multi-team conflicts in multi-team systems, but more exploratory research is needed on the complete developmental process of inter-team conflicts. The study of the developmental pa -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary