Abstract:We developed a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm with the goal of producing transparent models (i.e., understandable by humans) while also flexibly accounting for nonlinearity and interactions. Our method is based on ranked sparsity, and it allows for flexibility and user control in varying the shade of the opacity of black box machine learning methods. The main tenet of ranked sparsity is that an algorithm should be more skeptical of higher-order polynomials and interactions a priori compared to main effects, and hence, the inclusion of these more complex terms should require a higher level of evidence. In this work, we put our new ranked sparsity algorithm (as implemented in the open source R package, sparseR) to the test in a predictive model "bakeoff" (i.e., a benchmarking study of ML algorithms applied "out of the box", that is, with no special tuning). Algorithms were trained on a large set of simulated and real-world data sets from the Penn Machine Learning Benchmarks database, addressing both regression and binary classification problems. We evaluated the extent to which our human-centered algorithm can attain predictive accuracy that rivals popular black box approaches such as neural networks, random forests, and support vector machines, while also producing more interpretable models. Using out-of-bag error as a meta-outcome, we describe the properties of data sets in which human-centered approaches can perform as well as or better than black box approaches. We found that interpretable approaches predicted optimally or within 5% of the optimal method in most real-world data sets. We provide a more in-depth comparison of the performances of random forests to interpretable methods for several case studies, including exemplars in which algorithms performed similarly, and several cases when interpretable methods underperformed. This work provides a strong rationale for including human-centered transparent algorithms such as ours in predictive modeling applications.

Algorithms for interpretable machine learning

Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead

Interpretable machine learning: Fundamental principles and 10 grand challenges

What is Interpretable? Using Machine Learning to Design Interpretable Decision-Support Systems

Interpretability of machine learning‐based prediction models in healthcare

Interpretable and explainable machine learning: A methods‐centric overview with concrete examples

Selecting Interpretability Techniques for Healthcare Machine Learning models

Can a Transparent Machine Learning Algorithm Predict Better than Its Black Box Counterparts? A Benchmarking Study Using 110 Data Sets

Methods and Models for Interpretable Linear Classification

Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learning

In Pursuit of Interpretable, Fair and Accurate Machine Learning for Criminal Recidivism Prediction

Designing Inherently Interpretable Machine Learning Models

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Models

Designing an Interpretability-Based Model to Explain the Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Healthcare

Interpretable Classification Models for Recidivism Prediction

Interpretable representations in explainable AI: from theory to practice

Machine learning in medicine: should the pursuit of enhanced interpretability be abandoned?

Model Interpretation and Explainability: Towards Creating Transparency in Prediction Models

A Survey of the Interpretability Aspect of Deep Learning Models

Optimized Scoring Systems: Toward Trust in Machine Learning for Healthcare and Criminal Justice