Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

Machine Learning Bias in Computer Vision: Why do I have to care?

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Machine Learning and Bias in Medical Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges

Understanding Bias in Machine Learning

Bias in Machine Learning -- What is it Good for?

Need of Mitigating Bias in the Datasets using Machine Learning Algorithms

Fairness and Bias Mitigation in Computer Vision: A Survey

Lookism: The overlooked bias in computer vision

Ethical Challenges in Computer Vision: Ensuring Privacy and Mitigating Bias in Publicly Available Datasets

Bias and Fairness in Computer Vision Applications of the Criminal Justice System

Bias, Fairness and Accountability with Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Algorithms

Detection and Evaluation of bias-inducing Features in Machine learning

Bias in artificial intelligence for medical imaging: fundamentals, detection, avoidance, mitigation, challenges, ethics, and prospects

Machine learning for medical imaging: methodological failures and recommendations for the future

Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data

A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning

Comparing Human and Machine Bias in Face Recognition

Bias, Fairness, and Accountability with AI and ML Algorithms

Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?

Fantastic Biases (What are They) and Where to Find Them

Image Representations Learned With Unsupervised Pre-Training Contain Human-like Biases