Abstract:e12628 Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has now been widely used for patients with operable breast cancer (BC) to test drug sensitivity. Studies have indicated that early assessment of clinical response to NAT can help identify patients who are resistant to initial regimens, providing an additional opportunity to change treatment plan. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the optimal timing for conducting early evaluations of clinical response. This prospective study was conducted to evaluate the association between early evaluation of clinical response at different timing (post 2 cycles versus post 4 cycles) and pCR post NAT, in order to determine the most appropriate timing for NAT response evaluation. Clinical evaluations using ultrasound and MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) were also compared. Methods: A prospective cohort study including BC patients who received NAT was conducted between January 2018 and December 2023. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the clinical response evaluated at different timings in association with pCR. The heterogeneity of the associations for the post-cycle 2 and post-cycle 4 assessments was assessed. Linear regression analyses were used to assess the associations between extent of tumor reduction post 2 cycles and that post 4 cycles of NAT. Agreement of tumor measurements using ultrasound and MRI was also assessed. Results: A total of 186 BC patients were consecutively enrolled and included in this analysis. 55 (29.6%) of them achieved pCR. Partial response (PR) post 2 cycles and 4 cycles of NAT were both significantly associated with pCR post NAT, though the point estimate of association for PR post 2 cycles of NAT (OR=5.06, 95%CI:2.29-12.09) was more evident than that post 4 cycles (OR=2.79, 95%CI:1.20-7.21). Extent of tumor reduction post two cycles of NAT was highly correlated with that post four cycles (r=0.89, 95%CI=0.79-0.98, P< 0.01). Poor concordance was observed between ultrasound and MRI measurements of tumor size, whether at initial diagnosis (r=0.66, adjusted r2=0.43) or after two cycles of NAT (r=0.59, adjusted r2=0.35). Among those patients who had PR post 2 cycles of NAT, tumor reduction by greater than 50% was not associated with higher probability of reaching pCR in comparison to those lower than 50% (OR=1.86, 95%CI=0.82-4.37, P=0.143). Conclusions: Tumor response assessed using MRI after two cycles of NAT was highly correlated with pCR, and may be adopted as an optimal strategy for early evaluation of the efficacy of NAT regimen. Further studies are warranted to evaluate changes in treatment plan at early phase of NAT for those resistant to initial regimens.

Predictive Factors for Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer

Predicting the response to neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer: tumor-, blood-, and imaging-related biomarkers

On-treatment biopsies to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Predictive Factors for Complete Pathological Response in Hormone Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Evaluation of Early Response in Association with Pathological Response in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Predictive markers of complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in triple negative breast cancer.

Analysis of Factors Associated With Pathological Complete Response in Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Predictive Markers of Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy with Dual HER2-Blockade

Factors influencing pathological complete response and tumor regression in neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer

Clinical and pathological factors predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A single center experience

Assessment and Response to Neoadjuvant Treatments in Breast Cancer: Current Practice, Response Monitoring, Future Approaches and Perspectives

Prognostic implications of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer subtypes

Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Impact on Breast Cancer Recurrence and Survival: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis

Value of Pre-Treatment Biomarkers in Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Hormone Receptor-Positive Postmenopausal Breast Cancer.

Determinants of pathological complete response and tumor regression in high-risk breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Clinicopathological Factors Predicting Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Anti-HER2 Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

A clinicopathological-imaging nomogram for the prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer cases administered neoadjuvant therapy

Predictive Factors of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Validated by Three Anatomopathological Scores: Residual Cancer Burden, Chevallier System, and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Prospective Validation of Immunological Infiltrate for Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer – A Substudy of the Neoadjuvant GeparQuinto Trial

On-treatment biomarkers can improve prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Predictors of Response and Survival Outcomes of Triple Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy