Practitioners’ perspectives on the purpose of environmental education

John Fraser,Rupanwita Gupta,Marianne E. Krasny
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.933777
IF: 3.725
2014-09-30
Environmental Education Research
Abstract:Since the 1980s, scholars have suggested that environmental education (EE) has a ‘definitional problem’ represented by a multiplicity of perspectives that have critically impacted its discourse, practices, and outcomes. This study sought to investigate how North American EE practitioners from backgrounds ranging from formal and non-formal institutions think about their work. We focused on folk narratives and emerging urban environmental concerns of community education rather than reliance on academic opinion alone. Using Q methodology, the study identified five distinct perspectives that appear to represent different ways of prioritizing EE outcomes. All five perspectives were concerned with promoting sustainable living and improved human well-being, but the nuances suggest that an individual who adheres strongly to one may feel someone holding a contrasting perspective is working at cross-purposes. The authors suggest that understanding these perspectives can help reduce misunderstanding within the EE field.
environmental studies,education & educational research
What problem does this paper attempt to address?