Biogeographic patterns in below-ground diversity in New York City's Central Park are similar to those observed globally

Kelly S. Ramirez,Jonathan W. Leff,Albert Barberán,Scott Thomas Bates,Jason Betley,Thomas W. Crowther,Eugene F. Kelly,Emily E. Oldfield,E. Ashley Shaw,Christopher Steenbock,Mark A. Bradford,Diana H. Wall,Noah Fierer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1988
2014-11-22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Abstract:Soil biota play key roles in the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, however, compared to our knowledge of above-ground plant and animal diversity, the biodiversity found in soils remains largely uncharacterized. Here, we present an assessment of soil biodiversity and biogeographic patterns across Central Park in New York City that spanned all three domains of life, demonstrating that even an urban, managed system harbours large amounts of undescribed soil biodiversity. Despite high variability across the Park, below-ground diversity patterns were predictable based on soil characteristics, with prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities exhibiting overlapping biogeographic patterns. Further, Central Park soils harboured nearly as many distinct soil microbial phylotypes and types of soil communities as we found in biomes across the globe (including arctic, tropical and desert soils). This integrated cross-domain investigation highlights that the amount and patterning of novel and uncharacterized diversity at a single urban location matches that observed across natural ecosystems spanning multiple biomes and continents.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand the underground biodiversity patterns in Central Park, New York City, and their similarities to global soil biodiversity. Specifically, the researchers hope to answer the following questions: 1. **What microorganisms (including bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes) exist in the soil of Central Park?** 2. **Can the diversity patterns of these microorganisms be predicted? If so, based on what environmental factors?** 3. **Are the underground biodiversity patterns in Central Park similar to the soil biodiversity patterns in other parts of the world?** ### Research Background Soil organisms play a crucial role in terrestrial ecosystems, but compared to above - ground plant and animal diversity, the biodiversity in the soil has not been fully characterized. To fill this knowledge gap, the researchers chose Central Park in New York City as the research object because the park has highly variable soil conditions and is a human - managed urban system. ### Main Findings 1. **High Undescribed Biodiversity**: The study shows that the soil in Central Park contains a large number of undescribed microbial communities. Through high - throughput sequencing technology, the researchers discovered more than 120,000 bacterial taxa, 1,659 archaea taxa, and 43,429 eukaryote taxa (phylotypes). Among them, only 8.5% - 16.2% of the sequences can be matched in the existing databases, indicating that most soil microorganisms are still unknown. 2. **Predictable Biogeographic Patterns**: Although there are significant differences among soil samples in Central Park, its underground biodiversity patterns can be predicted based on soil properties (such as pH value). In particular, soil pH is the main environmental factor affecting the composition of bacterial and archaea communities. 3. **Similarity to Global Patterns**: The soil microbial diversity patterns in Central Park are similar to those in different biomes around the world (including Arctic, tropical, and desert soils). This indicates that even in an urban environment, the patterns of underground biodiversity are consistent with those in natural ecosystems. ### Conclusion This study emphasizes the under - recognized biodiversity in urban soils and reveals the important influence of soil environmental factors (such as pH value) on the structure of microbial communities. These findings contribute to a further understanding of the basic principles of microbial ecology and provide a new perspective for future biodiversity research. ### Formula Representation The formulas involved in this paper are mainly used to describe data analysis methods, such as calculating Bray - Curtis distance and Jaccard index, etc. Here are two commonly used formulas: - **Bray - Curtis Distance**: \[ D_{BC}(A, B)=\frac{\sum|a_{i}-b_{i}|}{\sum(a_{i}+b_{i})} \] where \(A\) and \(B\) are two samples, and \(a_{i}\) and \(b_{i}\) are the abundances of the \(i\)-th taxon in samples \(A\) and \(B\), respectively. - **Jaccard Index**: \[ J(A, B)=\frac{|A\cap B|}{|A\cup B|} \] where \(A\) and \(B\) are two sample sets, \(|A\cap B|\) represents the number of taxa shared by the two samples, and \(|A\cup B|\) represents the total number of all taxa in the two samples. These formulas are used to quantify the similarity and difference between samples, thus helping to explain biogeographic patterns.